Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Economists Warn Obamanomics Could Create Depression; WSJ's Moore Responds
NewsBusters ^ | September 8, 2009 | Jeff Poor

Posted on 09/08/2009 9:14:28 AM PDT by Rufus2007

It's clear that President Barack Obama's $787-billion stimulus hasn't worked as advertised, but some economists are worried it could backfire and cause something much worse.

According to a new study by economists Charles Rowley of George Mason University and Nathanael Smith of the Locke Institute and endorsed by Nobel laureate James Buchanan, the Keynesian tactics employed by Obama "will ultimately hamper the long-term growth potential of the U.S. economy and may risk delaying full economic recovery by several years." The study accuses the president of making Depression-era mistakes.

Stephen Moore, member of the Wall Street Journal editorial board and senior economics writer, explained the study on Fox News "On the Record" Sept. 7 and said that the stimulus certainly hasn't lived up to its billing.

...more (w/video)...

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 0bama; 0bamaisfailing; atlasshrugged; bhostimulus; bigteaparty912; depression; donttaxmykids; donttreadonme; economy; keepthechange; livefreeordie; porkulus; takebackamerica; tanstaafl; thecomingdepression; time2partyagain; wakeupamerica
Now they tell us...
1 posted on 09/08/2009 9:14:29 AM PDT by Rufus2007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

They will just switch it around and it will become the George Bush stimulus package. Problem is GWB had very little to do with how it was spent.


2 posted on 09/08/2009 9:23:39 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

The theory of Keynsian debt stimulus is that you jumpstart economy so you can raise taxes and remove the debt (this either never happens, or never works.) But if you run up big debts and get little or no recovery, you are screwed.


3 posted on 09/08/2009 9:23:43 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Socialist Conservatives: "'Big government is free because tax cuts pay for it'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Be assured, it is none of the so-called ‘expert economist’ in the Barry White House or those that back Barry that are espousing this.....


4 posted on 09/08/2009 9:30:16 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

OBAMAVILLE

Gett’n a head fake,
watchin’ msn’s take;
All of their pundits oozing foul oil.
Clean’n my six gun on my front porch swing.
Felling my blood—
It’s beginnin’ to boil.

Wasted away again in Obamaville,
Searchin’ for a job so I can earn my salt.
Some people claim that Bush is to blame,
But I know it’s Obama’s fault.

There’s no rhyme or reason,
They are all commitin’ treason
With nothing to show but a brand new tax or two.
But they are real beauties,
Despotic duties,
how they got passed I haven’t a clue.

Wasted away again in Obamaville,
Searchin’ for a job so I can earn my salt.
Some people claim that it’s Bush we should blame,
Now I think,— hell with them it’s Obama’s fault.

I blew out my flip flop,
Stepped on a pop top;
Cut my heel, but I just cruise on back home.
Because no medical care will the doctors render
They say there’s little service I can tender
And there’s no need for me to hang on.

Wasted away again in Obamaville
Searchin’ for a job so I can earn my salt.
Some people claim that Bush is to blame,
But I know, it’s my own damn fault.
Yes, and some people claim that Bush is to blame,
And I know because of my vote it’s my own damn fault


5 posted on 09/08/2009 9:30:45 AM PDT by Kartographer (".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
The theory of Keynsian debt stimulus is that you jumpstart economy so you can raise taxes and remove the debt (this either never happens, or never works.) But if you run up big debts and get little or no recovery, you are screwed.

A weird choice of economic rescue, then. Unless they want us to revisit the Depression Era.

6 posted on 09/08/2009 9:45:54 AM PDT by fortunecookie (Please pray for Anna, age 7, who waits for a new kidney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Hyper-Inflation or Poverty Making Inflation is on the way. Be Prepared.


7 posted on 09/08/2009 9:57:41 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

Watching Fox, Carl Cameron is on saying that the nuke option is still on the table for the dems.


8 posted on 09/08/2009 10:08:19 AM PDT by LegalEagle61 (If you are going to burn our flag, please make sure you are wearing it when you do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
Yeah, no kidding. I would advise few thousand in gold, really.



9 posted on 09/08/2009 10:08:48 AM PDT by steve0 (My plan B: christianexodus.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

According to the Sunday talking heads, only about 10% of the $787 billion has actually been realeased. Since that is over a 7 month period, the ratio would indicate it will take 70 or more months to get all that money into the economy stream.

That is well over the 4 years that NObama might be in office.

This whole thing is now and always has been a smoke and mirrors game against the American taxpayer.

NObama is lying every time he opens his mouth.


10 posted on 09/08/2009 10:12:06 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortunecookie
RE :”A weird choice of economic rescue, then. Unless they want us to revisit the Depression Era.

Keyes worshiper Paul Krugman of The New York Times gave himself an out by upfront stating the stimulus was too small and needed to be few trillion of spending. As near as I can tell he thinks the inflation from all that government spending sets off the private economy like a race(pretty bad idea if you are the ones unemployed) , if he even really cares about private job creation at all.

I think Obama thought the economy would fix itself and hed get credit, like Clinton in 1992 and so the Pelosi bill was just democrat payoff(democrats think everything he has done has worked so far.) . But this crash was much worse than 1992 and was not going to fix itself as easily (with time it would correctly fix itself for the long term.) .

11 posted on 09/08/2009 10:27:56 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Socialist Conservatives: "'Big government is free because tax cuts pay for it'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007
"...and the government usually spends the money on inefficient things."

Well duh.

On April 28, 2009, the U.S. Department of Agricultural signed contract number AG3J141202971961 with Clougherty Packing, LLC of Los Angeles in the amount of $1,191,200 to purchase 760,000 pounds of frozen sliced ham (in 2 pound packages) to be distributed to local organizations that assist the needy such as food banks, food pantries, and soup kitchens. This works out $1.567 per pound. On the day that the widely read web site Drudgreport.com made note of this contract, that source documented similar products selling for 79 cents a pound at Food Lion supermarket.

The Secretary of Agriculture's own press release defending the contract ended by highlighting what he thought was most important aspect of it: While the principal purpose of these expenditures is to provide food to those hardest hit by these tough times, the purchases also provide a modest economic benefit of benefiting Americans working at food retailers, manufacturers and transportation companies as well as the farmers and ranchers who produce our food supply." No mention of how much wealth was destroyed in the process of using government to provide a “modest economic benefit” to so many Americans.

12 posted on 09/08/2009 10:48:27 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat
Let me add that in proudly borrowing money in our name so it can be used to pay $1.57 for something that we ourselves would pay far less for, that in a nutshell is EXACTLY why government cannot “stimulate” the economy. Government's role is only to maintain the most efficient legal, taxation and policy environment so private individuals can maximize their economic gains. Any attempt to go further brings government into an arena that it is not equipped by temperament or by structure to be in, and in doing so invites government to start choosing winners and losers.
13 posted on 09/08/2009 10:53:36 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Keynes would be appalled ... indeed he was, before his death.

Yes, it presupposes that you are frugal during prosperous years, and run up surpluses. Then you can cut taxes during recessions and run deficits.


14 posted on 09/08/2009 11:52:46 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

Surpluses! Ha! Ha! Ha!


15 posted on 09/08/2009 12:49:46 PM PDT by Darth Reardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson