[jessduntno]

“There is something quite perverse about a society that allows avowed and unrepentant homosexuals to unnaturally take on children as playthings.”

Also repugnant, IMNSHO, is the use of “they are expecting a child” when, for obvious reasons “they” could not POSSIBLY have conceived. It is the slight of hand that the left does with rediculous name reversals (like “FAMILY PLANNING”) that implies something that in fact does just not happen...

[DesertRenegade]

“’they’ could not POSSIBLY have conceived. It is the slight of hand that the left does with rediculous name reversals (like ‘FAMILY PLANNING’)”

Exactly. The media casually reports she is pregnant, yet these homosexual couples have to use a whole series of bizarre test tube procedures in order to obtain their human play toy. There is nothing natural or loving about it. There are thousands of crying infants waiting for adoption, yet these two lesbians prefer to ‘create’ and then damage a newborn by denying him or her a father.

[Steelfish]

This should be made a criminal act- it is selfish and does emotional violence to the child.

[Clinging Bitterly]

Biggest thing to me is the playing with the language they do to portray themselves as having a natural relationship (but note here the writer of the story said that & it's not certain the couple would have said it the same way), the two of them expecting a child as you say, and so forth.

One of them is expecting the child, the other is perhaps going to help raise the child. Not intending to diminish that particular role, but it is what it is.

And it's fine. They can do that if the (at least) three parties involved have agreed to do so. Just don't pretend it's something other than what it is and dilute the understanding of the basics.