Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blueflag

Whenever we have changed insurance, pre-existing conditions were not covered only for a certain length of time. Is that not the case anymore?


13 posted on 10/07/2009 12:16:12 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: brytlea

The law still limits it to one year.


17 posted on 10/07/2009 12:16:58 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: brytlea

For group policies, if you haven’t been without coverage for more than 60 days you have no waiting period for preexisting.


20 posted on 10/07/2009 12:17:21 PM PDT by ElenaM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: brytlea

Risk assessment is an actuarial/statistical LOGICAL process. IF today I have Type 2 diabetes, and thus am excluded for certain risks becasue of that, and two years later I still have Type 2 diabetes and have a relatively unchanged phenotype, then my risks have not changed, and an insurer does not OWE me insurance. They are in the business of covering risk for a profit.

Lastly, insurance is a substitute for cash. Insurance takes a ‘gamble’ on covering the distance between YOUR cash and the RISK of having to come up with CASH to cover the gap. Pre-existing conditions are pre-existing risks. Unless the risk goes away, the insurance is likely not to be offered. It doesn’t make actuarial sense.


27 posted on 10/07/2009 12:22:41 PM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson