Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IbJensen
Pelosi then shook her head before taking a question from another reporter. Her press spokesman, Nadeam Elshami, then told CNSNews.com that asking the speaker of the House where the Constiution authorized Congress to mandated that individual Americans buy health insurance as not a "serious question."

In order to answer the question, the Speaker would have to actually know the contents of the document in question.

6 posted on 10/23/2009 5:55:29 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The_Victor

They seriously don’t care what’s in the Constitution.
Their wisdom and discretion is superior to it.


10 posted on 10/23/2009 5:56:38 AM PDT by MrB (The only difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor

“In order to answer the question, the Speaker would have to actually know the contents of the document in question.”

Has there ever been anyone as dumb ass stupid as Speaker Pelosi? She is as sharp as a bowling ball. BOWLING Ball that is!!!!!!


39 posted on 10/23/2009 6:18:46 AM PDT by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor

“In order to answer the question, the Speaker would have to actually know the contents of the document in question.”

Has there ever been anyone as dumb ass stupid as Speaker Pelosi? She is as sharp as a bowling ball. BOWLING Ball that is!!!!!!


43 posted on 10/23/2009 6:25:46 AM PDT by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor
In order to answer the question, the Speaker would have to actually know the contents of the document in question.

Exactly. Apart from her broader ignorance of and disregard for the constitution, she literally had no idea how to even pretend to answer that question.

Her "Are you serious? Are you serious?" response was classic stall by someone who is entirely out of their element. She was just flat-out stumped. Didn't even try to dance around it or blow her usual smoke--which she would have if she'd had the slightest shred of knowledge that related to the question. She couldn't even come up with the democrats' favorite, magical, all-purpose commerce clause. That only came later, in the written response to CNS--obviously, the product of staff. If that had honestly been her constitutional basis, she would have invoked it in her oral response.

74 posted on 10/23/2009 8:06:34 AM PDT by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson