Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Cannot Accept Nobel Prize Without Congress' Consent, Three House Republicans Claim
Fox News ^ | 10/27/2009

Posted on 10/28/2009 8:41:55 PM PDT by GoldStandard

As critics continue to mull over whether President Obama deserved the Nobel Peace Prize, Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite says the U.S. Constitution does not allow him to accept the award without the consent of Congress.

In a letter to Obama delivered on Monday, Brown-Waite, R-Fla., along with Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., and Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, claim the president is obligated under the Constitution to obtain Congress' approval before he formally accepts the prize.

Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution, the emolument clause, states: "And no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince or foreign state."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: cliffstearns; congress; ginnybrownwaite; nobelpeaceprize; nobelprize; obama; paul; ronpaul; stearns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 10/28/2009 8:41:55 PM PDT by GoldStandard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

I thought congress gave consent for such prizes almost a half a century ago. U.S. Code Title 5, Part III, Subpart F, Chapter 73, Subchapter IV, Section 7342: Receipt and disposition of foreign gifts and decorations.

They should focus on the real problem, his taking a position in the UN- that Congress has never given consent for and is far worse than some stupid prize that has long ago been tarnished.


2 posted on 10/28/2009 8:44:54 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

I sure wish Obama were humble enough to tell the Nobel committee that he is not deserving of the peace prize. What a joke it was for him to have been nominated only for giving allegedly inspiring speeches and intending to work for world peace and all that.


3 posted on 10/28/2009 8:45:33 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

The context appears to describe state sponsored gifts, which the Nobel is not.


4 posted on 10/28/2009 8:45:57 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (ACORN: Absolute Criminal Organization of Reprobate Nuisances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

“...the U.S. Constitution does not allow him to accept the award without the consent of Congress. “

Oh, that’s okay... since WHEN do obama and our democrat congress let a little thing like the CONSTITUTION prevent them from getting what they want???


5 posted on 10/28/2009 8:46:28 PM PDT by joethedrummer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: mnehring
They should focus on the real problem, his taking a position in the UN- that Congress has never given consent for and is far worse than some stupid prize that has long ago been tarnished.

I totally agree.
If this is a valid issue, wouldn't the peanut President have to give his Peace Prize back?

7 posted on 10/28/2009 8:47:52 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Â…he's not America, he's an employee who hasn't risen to minimal expectations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

How did Obama do on the course today? Has he got that new putter working for him yet?


8 posted on 10/28/2009 8:48:49 PM PDT by CanaGuy (Go Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/102709_letter.pdf

Here is the letter Representatives Brown-Waite,Paul and Sterns wrote to the President


9 posted on 10/28/2009 8:50:40 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I work for a major American aerospace firm, and we can’t give gifts worth more than $20 to any government agent ... might be seen as an attempt to buy favor.

Soooooo when a President, hypothetically, gets $1 million or so, for things he hasn’t yet done but is considering maybe doing, from a foreign entity who may wish to sway his actions ... that’s just peachy?


10 posted on 10/28/2009 8:50:47 PM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

This is exactly the kind of harassing action the Democrats would take against a Republican president who was honored in this way. Which would never happen in a hundred years, but still.


11 posted on 10/28/2009 8:54:22 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Without the second, the rest are just politicians' BS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
The context appears to describe state sponsored gifts, which the Nobel is not.

It's awarded by the Norwegian parliament. That's a foreign government.

12 posted on 10/28/2009 8:55:10 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

That seems like a bribe to me.


13 posted on 10/28/2009 8:56:06 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

He received it when he was out of office.

“And no person holding any Office...”

From Article 1 Section 9


14 posted on 10/28/2009 8:57:37 PM PDT by digital-olive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
He already did:

"Let me be clear, I do not view it as a recognition of my own accomplishments, but rather as an affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people in all nations.

"To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who've been honored by this prize, men and women who've inspired me and inspired the entire world through their courageous pursuit of peace."
15 posted on 10/28/2009 8:58:45 PM PDT by TitleX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Just how did the Nobel Foundation manage to dragoon the Norwegian parliament into awarding its private charity?


16 posted on 10/28/2009 9:00:52 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (ACORN: Absolute Criminal Organization of Reprobate Nuisances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Alfred Nobel’s will.


17 posted on 10/28/2009 9:05:27 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

I wonder why they are concerned about this part of the Constitution and not the part about being a natural born citizen?


18 posted on 10/28/2009 9:08:53 PM PDT by jch10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Is that like the Will of Landru?


19 posted on 10/28/2009 9:12:04 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard
Obama Cannot Accept Nobel Prize Without Congress' Consent, Three House Republicans Claim

With Obama's win they confirmed that the Nobel Peace Prize is a joke. Let Obama go get his Cracker Jack prize and then laugh at him.

When your opponent is harming himself, stand back and urge him on.

20 posted on 10/28/2009 9:14:04 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson