Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exxon’s Earnings Reflect Decline in Energy Prices
NY Times ^ | 10/29/2009

Posted on 10/29/2009 10:10:56 AM PDT by TopQuark

Exxon Mobil, the world’s biggest publicly traded oil company, said Thursday that its profit fell 68 percent in the third quarter as oil and natural gas prices slumped from last year’s highs.

The company earned $4.73 billion, or 98 cents a share in the quarter, less than analysts had expected. That compares with earnings of $14.83 billion in the period a year ago, the company’s best quarter ever.

Exxon became the world’s most profitable corporation in 2008, earning $45 billion with oil averaging $100 a barrel. But the drop in prices has hurt Exxon and most other oil companies, as the economy has slowed. Many companies have been forced to cut budgets and abandon some projects.

Exxon’s shares were down nearly 2 percent, to $72.53, in late morning trading in New York.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: energy; exxon; exxonmobil; mobil; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
I am sure all those FReepers that have been saying that Exxon and other oils had been ripping us off will now step in to help the companies out. The truth is, there are cycles in oil demand and production, and the oil companies have not been ripping us off: the profits derived in good tymes allows them to keep going in bad times. Tens of millions of Americans who own Exxon --- many retirees, widows and orphans --- are poorer today, as the stock dropped 2%.
1 posted on 10/29/2009 10:10:56 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

Well, I’m poorer too as gas prices have jumped nearly a dollar a gallon here in MI.

Personally, I’d like to see the gasoline taxes dropped. Then we’d all be happy.


2 posted on 10/29/2009 10:12:50 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

Where are those hedge funds when you need ‘em????


3 posted on 10/29/2009 10:15:02 AM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: TopQuark

Although I’ve never complained about the oil companies or their profits, I’m glad the price of oil is down, and I’d like to see it go down some more, and stay down. I’d like to see farmers do well, but not so much if I have to pay $10.00 per loaf of bread.


5 posted on 10/29/2009 10:34:26 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

Yes but they are up 550% from 2 years ago.


6 posted on 10/29/2009 10:35:49 AM PDT by GUNGAGALUNGA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GUNGAGALUNGA
"they are 550% from 2 years ago."

What is "they?" Are you talking about the stock price of profit?

7 posted on 10/29/2009 10:38:41 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

ExxonMobil is also one of the best-run companies in the world, so I’m sure I speak for many investors when I say I’ve got all the confidence in the world that they’ll manage things well no matter what the economic climate.


8 posted on 10/29/2009 10:44:23 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (God is great, beer is good . . . and people are crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
You are unquestionably correct: they manage well in any climate. Managing well, however, translates merely into doing one’s best in bad circumstances. As far as I remember, they were losing money when oil was $11/barrel a decade or so ago. Good management ensured then that those losses were minimal.
9 posted on 10/29/2009 10:46:34 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
"Well, I’m poorer too as gas prices have jumped nearly a dollar a gallon here in MI."

True, but that is predicated on demand from places such as China and supply from OPEC, not the oil companies.

10 posted on 10/29/2009 10:48:32 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

I remember that we were told that the price of oil didn’t matter and that they made the same profit no matter the price.

Looks like that was a big ole lie. Nothing new there! Exxon is still making tons of money and I sure don’t cry for them.

We were being ripped off and big time. But Exxon wasn’t the main culprit, it was everyone in the oil chain from the speculators onward.


11 posted on 10/29/2009 11:10:17 AM PDT by packrat35 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.- M Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

Actually I was being sarcastic and spewing liberal talking points. But I was talking about the stock price/retirement plans etc.


12 posted on 10/29/2009 11:22:41 AM PDT by GUNGAGALUNGA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: packrat35
"Nothing new there! Exxon is still making tons of money and I sure don’t cry for them."

As I said earlier, they make money for a few years, and then lose money for a few years. You appear to believe what the Leftist MSM want you to believe.

"We were being ripped off and big time. "

What do you mean by being "ripped off?" If you know the "fair" price, you are following exactly what Marx said. Does that bother you?

Gas prices increased because of demand from China and India. This allowed OPEC (Arab producers) to get more profit.

The truth is, the oil industry is not very profitable.

"But Exxon wasn’t the main culprit,"

No, it was not a culprit at all.

"it was everyone in the oil chain from the speculators onward."

Speculators? An average commodity trader goes bankrupt in the first 18 months of his career.

Do you bother with the facts or just repeat what the communists tell you? And, being a conservative, why do you so easily violate Ten Commandments by defaming innocent people?

13 posted on 10/29/2009 11:25:16 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GUNGAGALUNGA

Thank you for the clarification.


14 posted on 10/29/2009 11:26:06 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

You sir are full of BS. Your so-called facts have been proved to be false. Don’t waste time with your idiotic lies to me.


15 posted on 10/29/2009 11:28:19 AM PDT by packrat35 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.- M Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: packrat35

You won’t have ol Exxon to kick around much longer. By the time Obama gets done with them with cap and tax, there won’t be a drop of gasoline refined in the US. Most of their profits are international and I don’t know why they don’t move offshore so they can get away from the idiots in DC. Since exploration is banned domestically, the US is simply a market for refined products, and Exxon and others have great plants overseas with great engineers from India and China to build whatever capacity is needed in the future. Note that this may be happening now, as Exxon announced last year that they were getting out of the retail gasoline business. I just hope that they remain a company traded on some stock exchange. What great management and what a great investment for my capital.


16 posted on 10/29/2009 11:29:16 AM PDT by calico_thompson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Tens of millions of Americans who own Exxon --- many retirees, widows and orphans --- are poorer today, as the stock dropped 2%

You don't think that there were tens of millions of Americans, many retirees, widows and orphans, who owned Chrysler or General Motors stock?

I'm not shedding any tears for Exxon...
we need to build nuclear power plants and electrically powered transit systems to reduce our dependence on oil.
Exxon can go pound sand with their OPECker butt-buddies.

17 posted on 10/29/2009 11:39:48 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
TQ: "Tens of millions of Americans who own Exxon --- many retirees, widows and orphans --- are poorer today, as the stock dropped 2%"

WG: "You don't think that there were tens of millions of Americans, many retirees, widows and orphans, who owned Chrysler or General Motors stock?"

It is surprising to see the lack of logic you habitually exhibit. What is the connection between the quoted sentence and GM?

"I'm not shedding any tears for Exxon..."

I know. A leftist like you would never care for the tens of Millions of Americans.

"we need to build nuclear power plants and electrically powered transit systems to reduce our dependence on oil."

That may be true but remains unproven. What is proven is that we need more drilling and refineries at home.

It is your buddies --- environmental wackos and Democrats -- that prevent us from doing so.

"Exxon can go pound sand with their OPECker butt-buddies."

I know, I know. Like all leftists, when you think of Exxon you imagine a big building where executives stash their bags with money. You don't even know what a corporation is. And, surprisingly for an engineer, are unwilling to learn even basics.

18 posted on 10/29/2009 11:47:57 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
What is proven is that we need more drilling and refineries at home.
Exxon's sockpuppet-in-chief had 8 years to do that.
Instead of drilling here at home, they used our military to subsidize their drilling in the Persian Gulf.
19 posted on 10/29/2009 11:54:27 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: packrat35
"You sir are full of BS."

I laid out specifics regarding every word you said.

"Your so-called facts have been proved to be false."

Please show us that this is so.

"Don’t waste time with your idiotic lies to me."

Are you so excited because I demonstrated that you know absolutely nothing what you are taking about?

As shown above, you are not only ignorant but also immoral. Since you are not willing either to think or to learn, writing to you is indeed a waste. Unless by mistake, I shall not do so in the future.

20 posted on 10/29/2009 11:58:06 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson