Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MelSmith
I get the feeling all these judges that are rejecting the lawsuits are saying that the time for the judciary was before the election, now that the election is over it's up to the legislative branch through impeachment.

And not a chance of that until after the midterm elections and Republicans get some power back.

6 posted on 10/30/2009 6:15:02 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TexasCajun

“And not a chance of that until after the midterm elections and Republicans get some power back.”

*If*.

I expect ACORN’s election fraud machine to be a political Juggernaut, by then.


12 posted on 10/30/2009 6:18:32 AM PDT by Salamander (I'm sure I need some rest but sleepin' don't come very easy in a straight white vest.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: TexasCajun
The Judge Carter ruling issued yesterday is a good indication of the breakdown of the Constitutional Republic. The judge cited as one of his excuses for not allowing the case to go to discovery that the oval office denizen was elected by the people so the judiciary no longer has jurisdiction to discover whether the oval office resident has defrauded the people in order to usurp the office.

Such convoluted reasoning can only be read as seeking any convenience to avoid honoring the oath the judge took to the Constitution and thus to honor the contract between we the people and the federal oligarchy of which the judge is now a reigning member in fact.

There are several problems with the flawed reasoning --like asserting that the impossibility of plaintiff candidate for presidency, Keyes, being elected eliminated the candidates possibility of being harmed by obama fraud if it occurred-- exposed in the judge's ruling, but that one seems the most egregious. The fix being in was exposed when it was discovered that the judge had recently hired a person who had worked last int he offices of the Pres_ _ent's lawyers at Perkins&Coie.

The issued ruling is so 'progressive in focus' one wonders if the marine on the bench even wrote it! The ruling is so cowardly in speciously excusing the judge from dealing with the case, it is hard to believe an heroic Marine would stoop so low.

46 posted on 10/30/2009 8:11:30 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: TexasCajun
I get the feeling all these judges that are rejecting the lawsuits are saying that the time for the judciary was before the election, now that the election is over it's up to the legislative branch through impeachment.

Before the primaries we made the case.
They said it wasn't the right time because he wasn't actually his party's candidate.

Before the main election we made the case.
They said it wasn't the right time because he wasn't actually the president elect.

Before the electoral college vote we made the case.
They said it wasn't the right time because he hadn't actually been elected until the electoral college said so.

Before the congress accepted the electoral college vote we made the case.
They said it wasn't the right time because he hadn't actually been approved until the congress accepted the electoral college vote.

Before was sworn in we made the case.
They said it wasn't the right time because he hadn't actually violated the constitution until he became president.

Now that he is in the White House, they say it's too late, you should have said something sooner!

59 posted on 10/30/2009 8:54:36 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 280 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: TexasCajun
I get the feeling all these judges that are rejecting the lawsuits are saying that the time for the judciary was before the election, now that the election is over it's up to the legislative branch through impeachment.

Perhaps. But many people were saying, before the election and then before the Enthronement, that these judges were waiting to act until AFTER the election, or AfTER the electoral vote was taken, or AFTER the inauguration.

I'm afraid that a likelier explanation is that none of these judges want to risk getting their heads cut off. And of course there are huge numbers of liberal judges that have been stuffed into the system, who are A-OK with the idea of a Communist takeover by a Kenyan Muslim.

65 posted on 10/30/2009 9:14:46 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: TexasCajun
I get the feeling all these judges that are rejecting the lawsuits are saying that the time for the judciary was before the election, now that the election is over it's up to the legislative branch through impeachment.

Before the election they were saying that "case" was not "ripe". The only time it might have been "ripe" but not "too late" was between the counting of the electoral votes and inauguration day. Now that is only 12 days. So much for the Jury Box. Next step....

118 posted on 10/31/2009 9:27:55 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson