Replies

I thought the debate on aerosols was over in the 1970's. It was a big hoopla then, but they changed propellents (probably the same guy who invented the substitute for freon) and nothing else was said.

The Gore-ites are in their final throes of playing chicken little...desparate to be right as nature proves them wrong with every September-October blizzard and record cold temps around the world.

I am so sick of all this "enviromental" crap, if a product has "green" on it, I won't buy it; I refuse to watch any TV program railing about "global warming", and I won't even shop at places that are fanatical about "being green". I'm even starting to not like Kermit the Frog, and I might let my grass die on purpose...it's so green.

Someone tell gore to retire to one of his many energy-guzzling mansions and count his millions...the spotlight is growing dim.

Aerosols can be tiny droplets of liquid suspended in the air or they can be tiny solid particles (such as tiny pieces of ash in smoke) suspended in the air. I think they are saying that the methane and either type liquid and/or solid aerosols hook up and cause whatever they say is happening. They aren’t talking about the propellant freon in this case.

Yeah I about turn green every time I see that word used in advertising. Butt-kissers to the eco-freaks and the brainwashed little kids. “But mommy, we NEED to be green! Don’t buy that product, buy THIS one. If you don’t, you HATE the earth!”