To: mlizzy
if this is a mutation and has components of seasonal and H1N1 does this mean that if you had the seasonal vaccine and/or the H1N1 vaccine that you would have partial immunity to this thing?
2 posted on
11/16/2009 7:12:30 AM PST by
DM1
To: DM1
This sounds like KGB with plausible deniability.
6 posted on
11/16/2009 7:15:49 AM PST by
Migraine
(Diversity is great... ...until it happens to YOU.)
To: DM1
/tin foil hat on No, it does not. The mutation came about because of manipulation of the virus during vaccine development. Those who got the vaccine will be the FIRST to die from the "Super-Flu".
/tin foil hat off
;-)
7 posted on
11/16/2009 7:17:12 AM PST by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
To: DM1
if this is a mutation and has components of seasonal and H1N1 does this mean that if you had the seasonal vaccine and/or the H1N1 vaccine that you would have partial immunity to this thing?
It's a long post, but the author feels the following is true:
"Depending on the degree of genetic changes, there is a possibility that some level of immunity may be conferred to people who already have H1N1 antibodies, but here's the dirty little secret the vaccine industry doesn't want you to know: People who built their own natural immunity to H1N1 through exposure rather than vaccines have a much greater likelihood of exhibiting natural immunity to genetic variations of H1N1. In other words, people who overcame H1N1 exposure on their own, without being vaccinated, have a far stronger defense against H1N1 variations that might appear" --Mike Adams.
9 posted on
11/16/2009 7:18:53 AM PST by
mlizzy
("Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person" --Mother Teresa.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson