Posted on 11/23/2009 5:51:36 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo
Obama’s Fundamental Misconception [Gordon G. Chang]
The best the defenders of President Obama’s trip to Asia can say at this moment is that the resounding chorus of criticism is premature. Of course, no presidential visit can be fully assessed until months — and sometimes years — after the event.
But the president has united the political spectrum against him for his abandonment of human rights as a central element of the American dialogue with China. The New York Times gently put it this way this weekend: “The American president must always be willing to stand up to Beijing in defense of core American interests and values.”
What the president does not understand is that American values are American interests. American diplomats tend to separate the two and sometimes think that promoting the former can undermine the latter. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton obviously subscribes to this view. After all, this February she famously said that the issue of Chinese human rights cannot be permitted to “interfere” with important topics of discussion with Beijing. The president, for his part, broke the precedent of the last three administrations and refused to see the Dalai Lama during His Holiness’s trip to Washington early last month. The administration indicated Obama did not want to rile the Chinese before his visit.
What Obama and Clinton fail to comprehend is that America derives its security because of its values. Peoples around the world support our policies precisely because they share our beliefs. And with the Chinese there is another dimension: Beijing’s ruthlessly pragmatic leaders see our failure to press human rights as a sign that we think we are weak. And if they think we are weak, they see little reason to cooperate. So promoting human rights is protecting American security.
Chinese officials were reported to have been ecstatic when Secretary Clinton issued her February remarks. Since then, they have been noticeably less cooperative on the great issues of the day. And in March, just one month after her statement, they felt bold enough to order their vessels to harass two of our unarmed ships in international waters in the South China and Yellow Seas. The Chinese even attempted to sever a towed sonar array from one of the Navy vessels. That hostile act constituted an attack on the United States.
— Gordon G. Chang is the author of Nuclear Showdown: North Korea Takes On the World. He lived and worked in China and Hong Kong for almost two decades.
Sad.
Pathetic.
All Asia is awash with criticism of this fiasco, in English language press, as well as in Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Thai, you name it from Japan and Korean peninsula all the way down to India. They consider this to be not a successful trip.
Great going, Barack Hussein Obama. Hmm...mmmm....MMMM!!
Ping!
I offer for your consideration the proposition that Mr. Obama's FUNDAMENTAL misconception is that HE is qualified to be anything more than a third-rate, race-hustling, "community organizer" in a thoroughly corrupt, failing city.
Of course, he HAS managed to get A LOT of other people to buy into his misconception, so he is obviously a talented illusionist.
“Sad.
Pathetic.”
And for you and I, completely expected.
Searched to see if it is in English yet, and it is not. Anywhere. It really paints a different picture than what the White House spinmeisters are saying back in D.C.
I hope to have that article up (translated) in a short summary version before the day is over in the U.S.
“... his abandonment of human rights...”
How can he criticize the holder of our national debt?? He’s put us in the untennable situation of being a financial slave to China. We CAN”T criticize them for anything. We must bow (very low)and beg politely for more money. Nauseating.
Not only Obama and Clinton, but a huge number of politicians. It's not limited to foreign policy, either. They're forgetting this important point in a large number of domestic issues and policies currently in play. That point alone could be why we either succeed or fail as a nation.
If there's no reason to cooperate, there is every reason to advance a conflict. The best time to launch a war is when there is a weakness in a great power.
I’m looking forward to it.
ping for later search
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.