Posted on 12/03/2009 7:51:48 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
She is scaring the bejeebers out of the libs.
Well this one is easy. Let's just watch the Israeli immigration satistics for, say, the next 12 to 24 months. I'm not how "flock to" translates into statistical terms. What percentage increase should we agree upon in advance that would resolve the question and show that Palin is/was correct?
If Sarah becomes President, I feel that she will be a good friend of Israel... and she will not be bashful about that friendship.
/
Your nose is in the wrong place lol.
A grossly misleading statement. Evangelicals believe that every person, Jew or gentile, will "convert" or face perdition. That includes people raised in evangelical churches.
The term "convert" as understood in evangelical christianity DOES NOT mean rejecting one's ethnic identity in favor of another, it means trusting Jesus and in his sacrifice for deliverance from the eternal consequence of our sin. A gentile growing up in the evangelical community needs conversion as much as anyone. It is a mistake to see "Conversion" as peculiarly focused upon Jews (though they are not left out either, since they sin just as much as the rest of us, and thus have the same need of a savior).
One of the criticisms one hears from time to time is how LITTLE missionary and evangelistic effort is focused on the Jews. Total expenditure and manpower for Jewish outreach amounts to much less than 1% of the total evangelical missionary effort.
Taken away from any “end times” malarkey, Sarah Palin has a 50% chance of being right, and a 100% right to her opinion. For some reason State thinks and has always thought that the Palis can be our allies if we’re just nicer to them and give them what they want.
"Founded in 1900, the Ring was at one time influential in the labor movement through its participation in and leadership of the Jewish Labor Committee. Having shrunk from the days when it was the largest organization of its kind in the country, it is now struggling to reinvent itself before its rapidly shrinking membership disappears completely.
"The Circle is strongly communist (Bundist) and labor-oriented at its inception, the political perspective of the Arbeter Ring is solidly leftist; on the American political spectrum it would generally be described as far-left liberal (e.g., the organization's strong opposition to the Vietnam War). Today the Circle opposes the Iraq war and unfair labor practices, and supports comprehensive immigration reform, single-payer universal health care, gun control,and abortion on demand."
Well, if there is less immigration, that would stand to reason. People don’t immigrate into war zones.
It’s all about power. They want to control spending. That is NOT the same thing as controlling costs, becau ee government intervention means more and more overhead at every level. But, again, the aim is the accumulation of power.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.