So a single incorrect claim in paleontology that takes three months to correct is somehow equivalent to the AGW fraud?
Yes, the Cult of Gaia (AGW) and the Cult of Darwin (Evolutionists) are related. Both Refuse the existence of God.
There’s been more than one single incorrect claim about a fossil in the scientific world. Evolution is replete with claims that have eventually proved to be bogus.
The problem is, that when the claims are made, they are heralded with great fanfare. When they are debunked, it’s swept under the carpet.
It’s dishonest to keep trumpeting the triumphs and not admitting so vocally when you were wrong.
One reason is that it’s the cowards way out. The other reason is that it leaves the false impression that much more evidence exists connecting man to primates than is really out there.
Either way is deceptive, either outright lying, or allowing a lie to propagate without correcting it as strongly as announcing it.
“So a single incorrect claim in paleontology that takes three months to correct is somehow equivalent to the AGW fraud?”
Actually more like dozens of frauds over the past 150 years (some of which still appearing in textbooks today YEARS after they’ve been debunked as frauds) that render evolution on par with climate “science.” The main difference is that evolution is a lie that’s been told much longer with a lot more funding behind it. Other than that, they are two sides of the same fraudulent coin.
Look, I am not a Christian, I have no dog in this fight. However, if you think that this is the only "mistake" or "incorrect claim" that evolutionists have made over the years you need to do some study. The claims of evolutionists are full of mistakes, incorrect labeling etc. This is just one of many. Anytime someone digs up an extinct primate of any kind it is hailed as a link to humans. So far most of them have been exposed as fraud. The French exposed even Lucy(back about 1990 or so, forget the exact date) as being an extinct Chimpanzee and not a link to humans at all.
If you are going to fight against creationists you need to come up with a more plausible argument than that this is a "single" incident of mistaken identity.