Nice statement.
Here’s a true statement: “The period 2000-2009 will be regarded as the warmest decade this century.”
Prejudiced Authors, Prejudiced Findings (IPCC Report)
Written by John McLean
| Tuesday, 15 July 2008 | |
|
For the Full Report in PDF Form, please go to the link. Summary Points for Policy MakersThe IPCC is a single-interest organisation, whose charter presumes a widespread human influence on climate, rather than consideration of whether such influence may be negligible or missing altogether. Though the IPCC's principles also state that a wide range of views is to be sought when selecting lead authors and contributing authors, this rule has been honored more in the breach than in the observance.More than two-thirds of all authors of chapter 9 of the IPCC’s 2007 climate-science assessment are part of a clique whose members have co-authored papers with each other and, we can surmise, very possibly at times acted as peer-reviewers for each other’s work. Of the 44 contributing authors, more than half have co-authored papers with the lead authors or coordinating lead authors of chapter 9. It is no surprise, therefore, that the majority of scientists who are skeptical of a human influence on climate significant enough to be damaging to the planet were unrepresented in the authorship of chapter 9. Many of the IPCC authors were climate modelers - or associated with laboratories committed to modeling - unwilling to admit that their models are neither accurate nor complete. Still less do they recognize or admit that modeling a chaotic object whose initial state and evolutionary processes are not known to a sufficient precision has a validation skill not significantly different from zero. In short, it cannot be done and has long been proven impossible. The modelers say that the “consensus” among their models is significant: but it is an artifact of ex-post-facto tuning to replicate historical temperatures, of repeated intercomparison studies, and of the authors’ shared belief in the unrealistically high estimate of climate sensitivity upon which all of the models assume. The hypothesis of damaging, man-made warming is a long way from being proven – and, given the recent trend in the peer-reviewed literature, is well on the way to being disproven. Recent cooling of the planet further suggests that man-made warming is at best too weak to be detected in the “noise” of natural internal variability. Governments have naively and unwisely accepted the claims of a human influence on global temperatures made by a close-knit clique of a few dozen scientists, many of them climate modellers, as if such claims were representative of the opinion of the wider scientific community. On the evidence presented here, the IPCC’s selection of its chapter authors appears so prejudiced towards a predetermined outcome that it renders its scientific assessment of the climate suspect and its conclusions inappropriate for policy making. |
It doesn’t matter what these folks have to say- they’ve been making these cofnessions for years now, and NOONE i nthe maisntream media is reporting on it so that people can understand that this whole climate change issue is a FRAUD- NOONE in the mainstream media will pick up this story and EVERYONE at copenhagen will simply ignore his confession just like they always have-
We have been sucked into the greatest fraud in history- and htere isn’t a damn thing we can do about it- the TRUTH no logner matters- EVERY nation on earth knows this is a FRAUD, but yet practically EVERY nation on earth is at copenhagen ignorign hte fact that this is a fraud, and ‘tryign ot hammer out deals to ‘save the planet’ knowing ful lwell there isn’t a dam nthing we can do to affect the climate one iota
The TRUTH has lost- Whether a deal gets signed at copenhagen or not- the fraud WILL happen, next year, or hte year after because these criminals will NEVER stop defraudign hte world, and the world will NEVER stop being swindled willingly- and the TRUTH has lost
thanks for that Dr. Gray.
But make no mistake, you and the entire population of the world will soon be controlled beyond what you or anyone other than our lourds thought possible. “1984” will seem like child’s play when obama and his fellow traveler/muslims deliver the final blow. Maybe you, like me, will go down fighting too. I hope so.
Ping.
Thanks for this. Truth still has a chance. Remember the parable about the frog in the bucket of milk, right? Keep on kicking.
ping
I believe that there were substantially higher concentrations of CO2 back in the early 1940's.
Of course getting honest (non-homogenized) data is difficult on the subject of CO2, but a google search can turn up a couple of refrences.
Dr. Gray is one of the few scientists who has been able to speak out about man-made global warming and the scammers who make money off of it. His reputation has not taken a hit (as evidenced by his name being so recognizable by the non-scientific community, especially those of us in hurricane land) and his research has not been supressed like so many other.
Given his name recognition he will be able to explain to the average American; who has been fooled by years of global warming bull, that it was all a lie, a lie to grab power and make money.
More power to Dr. Gray; I hope he continues to speak up loudly and often about this sham of the century.