Not at all.
..
Dums love violence,interesting Douglas suggested his death if he didn’t stop speaking against slavery.
...........
Senator Charles Sumner Delivers a Fiery Senate Speech Denouncing Slavery
On May 19, 1856, Senator Charles Sumner of Massachusetts, a prominent voice in the anti-slavery movement, delivered an impassioned speech denouncing the compromises that helped perpetuate slavery and led to the current confrontations in Kansas. Sumner began by denouncing the Missouri Compromise, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the concept of popular sovereignty, in which residents of new states could decide whether to make slavery legal.
Continuing his speech the next day, Sumner, singled out three men in particular: Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois, a major proponent of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Senator James Mason of Virginia, and Senator Andrew Pickens Butler of South Carolina.
Butler, who had recently been incapacitated by a stroke and was recuperating in South Carolina, was held to particular ridicule by Sumner. Sumner said that Butler had taken as his mistress “the harlot, slavery.” Sumner also referred to the South as an immoral place for allowing slavery, and he mocked South Carolina.
Listening from the back of the Senate chamber, Stephen Douglas reportedly said, “that damned fool will get himself killed by some other damned fool.”
Sumner’s impassioned case for a free Kansas was met with approval by northern newspapers, but many in Washington criticized the bitter and mocking tone of his speech.
A Southern Congressman Takes Offense
One southerner, Preston Brooks, a member of the House of Representatives from South Carolina, was particularly incensed. Not only had the fiery Sumner ridiculed his home state, but Brooks was the nephew of Andrew Butler, one of Sumner’s targets.
Your conclusions are in error, sir. Congressman Brooks didn’t challenge Sumner to a duel because he was no gentleman, and the proper response was a thorough walloping one would give to a sniping cur or common drunkard. Sumner violated Senate decorum first with his vicious slander of Sen. Butler.
Sen. Douglas neither did “suggest his death”, he was mere witness to Sumner’s vicious slander, and had the common sense to conclude Sumner was a damn fool and writing a check his butt couldn’t cash (which had nothing to do with slavery, and everything to do with Sumner wanting to grab headlines and act the sainted martyr, just like any demogogue liberal today — personal opportunism).
In any event, there is next to no comparison between that event and Ed Schultz’s psychotic ravings. If anything, Schultz is closer to Sumner in viciousness, and Lieberman ought to wallop him with a gutta-percha cane.