The article is almost completely right on. obama is just bush on steroids. bush did terrible damage to the Republican party, on top of squandering the incredible opportunity of 2000.
Love live Ron Paul and traditional conservatism! Invite the world and invade the world is not conservatism, but rather globalist liberalism. Remember the very important issue of “Democrat wars”? bush sure fubared that as a Republican issue...
If we are fighting them there, so we don’t have to fight them here, why did duhbya insist on continuing to bring them here? Why must our brave men fight the hajis over there, only to come home to suffer from and be murdered by hajis here? Why did duhbya trade an increase in Saudi oil production for 15,000 more Saudi Arabian students (ummmm... After 9/11, why are there any Saudi Arabian students here?) On that note, when Saudi Arabians attacked us on 9/11 (you know, none of the highjackers were from Iraq or Afghanistan), why didn’t we declare war (Oh. Declaring war is part of fighting a war to win - just check our win/loss/draw record on declared vs undeclared wars) on Saudi Arabia? Did we attack Brazil and Peru (because they have large expatriate Japanese populations) when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, while at the same time leaving Japan alone?
Isn’t it great that the bushbots gave obama and his communist scum the “patriot act”? It isn’t popular in here, but the Nazis didn’t enact gun registration in Germany. A moronic government in the ‘20s already had. The Nazis just used the registration information to send the brownshirts to the doors of those who had guns. When the greenshirts come to haul away bushbots on obama’s legal orders under the “patriot act” (after some real or contrived “incident”), the bushbots will ask (in the classic Solzhenitsyn way): “Me? What for?”
The same guy that backed out on Reagan when he put the Pershings in Europe and toppled the Soviets. Paul's reason? He "understood" why the Soviets would be upset. Look it up, Newbie, we covered it a long time ago with your ilk.
I was on the Bush-bot side for many years but saw the light the last few.
Both liberal/progressives and the Bush-big-gov-conservatives are very shortsighted. They want the federal government to control our lives, and assume that those in charge of the federal government and our lives will always agree with them and their goals (pro-abort or anti-abort as an example.) . Then when we do get to an election they have to say the their side must win (McCain) because the other side will kill us all if they win, with the power they gave the government themselves ironically.
Do Bush-bots want Obama using homeland security to watch them? Do liberals want Cheney in charge of the ‘death panels’ ?? No, both claim the other side will kill us with the power, but not them,
Now Mark Levin writes about Liberty, but the past eight years he implied that Liberty was the talk of traitors (I was a Levin fan too,)