>>Show us the documentation of that. You can’t, because that’s a couple more lies. <<
You can’t prove the converse either. The law was and is on his side, as it should be. Unless Ms. Schaivo told you something herself.
>>Michael testified in court, and told the press that was covering one of his fund raisers, that Terri was responding to therapy, and that he promised her that he would take care of her for the rest of their lives.<<
And he did.
>> Liberals are the ones who supported the government order to kill Terri, in opposition to her indisputable publicly demonstrated religious convictions.
Wagglebee hasn’t said anything about Terri’s estranged husband that hasn’t been proven true.<<
He went for comfort when there was none available from his wife. Not cool, but who are you to stand in judgment? As far as the rest go, it is all simple smearing to share up a political, pro Big Government agenda.
>>Terri’s family was involved with her from the time she was born. They didn’t stop being involved with her, except to the extent that her estranged husband succeeded in depriving her of contact with her family and friends. Even so, they continued in their attempts to be as involved with her as they could.<<
Most of us grow up. Once you are an adult and make adult decisions, your parents no longer have legal standing. It amazed me the court allowed these legal strangers to even get involved.
>>Terri’s family spent their own money caring for Terri, until her estranged husband received the money from his fraudulent lawsuit. When Terri’s Dad asked him to keep his word and use the money for Terri’s rehab, that’s when Michael became adversarial. <<
The parents mixed it up in the courts the moment money came into the picture.
Sun, do you still have the link to the advertisement for the fund raiser Michael Schiavo held, in which he stated that Terri was responding well to the brain implant, and was showing progress?
It's already been proven. Michael's court testimony was documented.
Your troll-tactic of changing the subject mid-sentence is an old one. Okay, so now you want to make it about the laws that were violated. Or is it about Terri's knowledge of law? Could you try to say something that actually makes sense?
And he did.
He did what? Take care of her for the rest of their lives? The context in which he gave that testimony suggested that he promised to take care of her in the true sense of caring, not in the sense of "I'll take care of that bitch." Killing her was the direct opposite of what he testified he promised to do for her.
He went for comfort when there was none available from his wife. Not cool, but who are you to stand in judgment? As far as the rest go, it is all simple smearing to share up a political, pro Big Government agenda.
What does that have to do with anything we were discussing? Nothing. But trolls must change the subject frequently. So okay, you want to talk about Terri's estranged husband violating more than just his vow not to kill her. You want to introduce his sexual infidelity. But how do his sexual escapades support small government? I don't get the connection you're trying to make there.
Most of us grow up. Once you are an adult and make adult decisions, your parents no longer have legal standing. It amazed me the court allowed these legal strangers to even get involved.
So now you're saying that when she grew up her family should have severed all involvement in her life? That's what you claimed they did in your previous post. Make up your mind. Pick a belief, and defend that belief. Only trolls change their belief midstream to enable them to continue arguing.
The parents mixed it up in the courts the moment money came into the picture.
Mixed what up? Are you now trying to suggest that it's their fault Michael embezzled Terri's rehab money?
From the injury HE gave her. How convenient....
fd: And he did.
Until he got tired of it and murdered her.
There is no legitimate reason in the world that he could not simply have divorced her and let her parents take over the care.
All your championing of freedom from government intrusion have the same hollow ring to it that all the pro-choicers have when they claim that a woman has a *right* to murder her own baby because it's her body and the government doesn't have the right to interfere and tell her she can't murder it.