Ability to "think" is totally subjective and has NOTHING to do with brain death.
The final provisions of a person has always been held with the closest family. There is no legal relationship closer than spouse.
So, in the absence of a legal document you believe that a spouse should be allowed to kill someone?
You can presume all you want. Many of us want to be let go when we are are vegetables.
So, YOU want to impose YOUR desires on EVERYONE else?
She wasn’t married. Schaivo was.
What does that have to do with her response to therapy.
This is getting old, so I’ll answet the obly question that is of import:
>>So, in the absence of a legal document you believe that a spouse should be allowed to kill someone?<<
No, I the spouse is the only person who is legally allowed to express the stated desires of someone who is unable to think for themselves. You may want the government to think for you and break the law for you, but I think the law is more important than a narrow and political pro-Government agenda.
Unless and until you can produce a witness to gainsay the husband, your entire argument is sophistry and just more pro-Big-Government propaganda.
No, he simply cannot conceive of someone thinking differently than he does, so he projects onto others.
And yes, he does. That is readily apparent on other threads on which I've seen him post. His posting history, there for all to see, bears it out.