>>So now you’re back to saying that in the absence of a written document, the presumption should be that she told her husband the opposite of what she told everyone else, and she should be killed. You’re saying that the presumption should be in favor of death, not life. But you’re too cowardly to admit that’s what you’re saying. Heck, you’re even too cowardly to stick with the same opinion for two consecutive posts.<<
You need to read for comprehension. I have been 100% consistent. The fact you don’t LIKE the fact I oppose your fascism doesn’t make me inconsistent.
Your pathetic attempts to make strawmen doesn’t really work. I hear the beatings you give your wife are not nearly as bad as they used to be.
The law is clear about who controls the final wishes of someone — the closest relative. In this case, the husband.
You don’t like it, change the law.
In the meantime, take your fascist desires of government domination into personal away.
And, what IF he really was trying to murder her? Then what? Anything he does or says is A-0K, just because he is the husband?