United States vs Reynolds. No citizen can be coerced to enter into a contract. Indentured Servitude and all that jazz. It’s “settled law”.
Exactly. It’s a product and the gubmint cannot force you to buy a product. I’ve already escaped a socialist country called canada where if you do not pay your monthly premiums, the gubmint wrecks your credit report. Dont want to see this happen to this great lnad.
“United States vs Reynolds...
no citizen can be coerced to enter into a contract...”
-
I am trying to find this and read it.
Can you direct me?
I found two wrong ones already:
United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953), is a landmark legal case in 1953 that saw the formal recognition of State Secrets Privilege, a judicially recognized extension of presidential power.
and
Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878), was a Supreme Court of the United States case that held that religious duty was not a suitable defense to a criminal indictment.
That’s funny, I just paid my madatory auto insurance... Constitution doesn’t mean squat! Every man for himself!
“No citizen can be coerced to enter into a contract. Indentured Servitude and all that jazz. It’s “settled law”.”
Like Social Security? They don’t see it as a contract, but, rather, as a levied tax with benefits you can receive. If you obtain alternative insurance they wave the additional tax. See, tyranny is all in how you pose the answer.
<<<< United States vs Reynolds. No citizen can be coerced to enter into a contract. Indentured Servitude and all that jazz. It’s “settled law”.
<<<<
So is ‘child support’ - and under current Louisiana law there are at least 5 different ways that an order can exceed 100% of your income !!!