To: freedomwarrior998
This jerk should be removed from the bench.
2 posted on
01/06/2010 8:48:46 AM PST by
Psycho_Bunny
(ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
To: freedomwarrior998
Here is the judge:
"Oh you nasty boys!"
4 posted on
01/06/2010 8:51:39 AM PST by
capt. norm
(Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
To: freedomwarrior998
Anybody know anything about this judge? How about posting his home address and personal info?
6 posted on
01/06/2010 8:52:56 AM PST by
rmh47
(Go Kats! - Got Seven? [NRA Life Member])
To: freedomwarrior998
Re: Trial of fact Am I missing something? It doesn't seem that any facts are in dispute. Everyone agrees that California voters passed Prop 8. What "facts" does the judge want to determine?
7 posted on
01/06/2010 8:53:29 AM PST by
SSS Two
To: freedomwarrior998
Why have voters and citizens then? Let the radicals run it all. Who needs a Constitution when totalitarian democrats will tell us how to live and how to think.
8 posted on
01/06/2010 8:53:38 AM PST by
ezfindit
(ConservativeDatingSite.com - The Right Place for Conservative Singles)
To: freedomwarrior998
federal judge Federal government intrusion, once more.
13 posted on
01/06/2010 9:09:02 AM PST by
dragnet2
To: freedomwarrior998
Take the trial itself. The constitutionality of Proposition 8 The lawlessness, violence and chaos resulting from what the federal agents did to CA Prop 187, can now been seen from Las Vegas to Georgia and all points in between.
14 posted on
01/06/2010 9:13:33 AM PST by
dragnet2
To: freedomwarrior998
Next Judge Walker issued an extraordinary ruling that the private intentions of Prop. 8 proponents -- ideas by definition never communicated to voters -- were properly the subject of this trial. So now we really have thoughts on trial.
-PJ
15 posted on
01/06/2010 9:16:30 AM PST by
Political Junkie Too
("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
To: freedomwarrior998
Ahhh, but doesn’t his bizarre ruling open the door to allow defense attorneys to question the Judge’s private intentions about the trial before any further procedures begin? That way it goes on the record.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson