Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Socialized Healthcare Is Closer To Reality Than You Think
Canada Free Press ^ | Saturday, January 9, 2010 | By Otis A. Glazebrook, IV

Posted on 01/09/2010 3:03:43 PM PST by sheikdetailfeather

In an article for the Heritage Foundation entitled “Congress’s Secret Plan to pass Obamacare” authored by Brian Darling layout a four step plan for Obamacare to hitch a ride on an existing piece of Legislation which has originated in the House using a rare parliamentary procedure.

Steps one and Two have been completed.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; 2010; congress; constitution; corruption; democrats; healthcare; liberalfascism; obama; obamacare; reality; secret; senate; socialized; tyranny; vote
"Mr. Darling’s scenario for Step Three was to attach Obamacare to an unrelated bill - H.R 1586, a bill to impose a tax on bonuses received by certain TARP recipients. Mr. Reid has instead attached the bill to "H.R. 3590, which is entitled: “An Act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the first-time homebuyers credit in the case of members of the Armed Forces and certain other Federal employees, and for other purposes."
1 posted on 01/09/2010 3:03:43 PM PST by sheikdetailfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

“All that is now necessary is for the House to pass, by a simple majority vote to pass the Senate’s reconfigured H.R. 3590 without changes and present it to President Obama for his signature.”

Whoever thinks the megalomaniac House Speaker would defer to Sen. Reid in such a flagrant fashion clearly doesn’t know Nancy Pelosi. The little dance the House and Senate leaders will each do to prove the world, their minions, and their financial benefactors they are not getting “rolled” by the other may yet be the ace-in-the-hole that sends this down to defeat.


2 posted on 01/09/2010 3:27:29 PM PST by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrC
Whoever thinks the megalomaniac House Speaker would defer to Sen. Reid in such a flagrant fashion clearly doesn’t know Nancy Pelosi.

That's my thought, how can they give the Senate 100% of the goodies??
. . . not sure if they can get the enough Dems though even if she does decide to "oh well what the hell" and let the Senate version be voted on!
. . . what did Rahm say in that phone call to Pelosi? "It could all be over so quickly"
. . . and what about Ben Nelson's "marker only" legislation that awaits several states' AG lawsuits?(snicker)

Oh the chaos and conflict! So sad . . .
3 posted on 01/09/2010 3:50:11 PM PST by RushingWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Seems to me that this is not unlike the process used to pass Porkulus, which started in the Senate (against the Constitutional stricture that money bills must originate in the House). The Senate gutted a HR that had already passed and been sent to the Senate. They replaced everything after the title and number with the Porkulus text, passed it and sent it ‘back’ to the House. The House then simple passed the Senate version of Porkulus, but now under the title of the originally passed bill.

Pretty shady goings on, IMO. The difference between ‘legal’ and ‘proper’, I’d say.


4 posted on 01/09/2010 4:02:32 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

It isn’t a rare thing. The Senate can’t initiate spending, so any time they are doing their own legislation that includes spending, they always do so as an amendment to some spending bill passed by the house that the Senate has no intention of acting on.

It’s not “common”, because often the house has already passed a bill and the Senate can work on that one, but it is not unheard of, like in this case where Reid didn’t want to start with the hosue bill, even to substitute his amendment wholesale.

This leaves the house bill intact, and on the Senate agenda — theoretically, if the senate bill goes down, the senate COULD simply vote on the house bill, and if they got 60 votes, send it on to the President.


5 posted on 01/09/2010 10:27:28 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Three card monty from the criminals ....makes me sick. I cannot believe how any of these people sleep at night.


6 posted on 01/09/2010 11:49:56 PM PST by Blonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blonde
They sleep very well.

In coffins, that is.
7 posted on 01/10/2010 8:46:03 AM PST by Uncle Ivan (Alea iacta est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson