Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House reportedly mulls bank fee in budget
Reuters on Yahoo ^ | 1/11/10 | Matt Spetalnick and Glenn Somerville

Posted on 01/11/2010 11:58:58 AM PST by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Obama administration is considering imposing a fee on banks to help recover some of taxpayers' costs of bailing banks out from the financial crisis, according to multiple reports on Monday.

The White House said President Barack Obama wants to ensure that taxpayers are paid in full. "That's the president's goal," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters. He declined to provide details on how that might be done.

Politico, the Wall Street Journal and New York Times, in nearly identical stories on their websites, cited administration officials saying that a bank fee was under consideration and might be included in the president's budget proposal next month.

Such a fee, which would likely be highly popular with taxpayers still angry at bankers who are preparing to reap huge bonuses, could be part of next month's budget. Exactly what form such a fee might take will be hotly discussed but it is unlikely to be a broad-based fee on transactions.

A fee on financial transactions was suggested by British officials at a meeting of Group of Seven finance ministers last fall, but was opposed by U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

An official from the White House's Office of Management and Budget, asked on Monday if a bank fee was being mulled, did not reject it out of hand but would not confirm it either.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bankfee; mulls; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
This is just a rumor.. uh huh
1 posted on 01/11/2010 11:58:59 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
He wants to keep the banks weak and permanently dependent on him tossing crumbs to them to survive.
2 posted on 01/11/2010 12:01:22 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Gore is the fifth horseman of the apocalypse. He rides an icy horse bringing cold wherever he goes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

HAHAHHA You know how this is going to be paid if approved? By the banks charging US a fee on our bank accounts to repay OURSELVES! Way to go Dumbo, screw the citizen a little more.


3 posted on 01/11/2010 12:01:44 PM PST by world weary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

He’s a bufoon


4 posted on 01/11/2010 12:02:04 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The Obama administration is considering imposing a fee on banks to help recover some of taxpayers' costs of bailing banks out from the financial crisis, according to multiple reports on Monday.

The White House said President Barack Obama wants to ensure that taxpayers are paid in full.

And amazingly people will think they are getting a "good deal." Of course the banks will simply raise fees on customers to cover this cost.

5 posted on 01/11/2010 12:02:29 PM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“We’ll put pennies back in their left pocket while taking trillions out of their right, and the fools will think it’s a gift.”


6 posted on 01/11/2010 12:02:54 PM PST by Argus (We've gone downtown to Clown Town, and that's where we'll be living from now on..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

So... wouldn’t the banks just pass along the fee to consumers of their services?


7 posted on 01/11/2010 12:03:02 PM PST by Heartlander2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Banks don't pay fees. Their customers do. Watch for this stealth tax increase to arrive in your mailbox disguised as service "fees" from your bank. Obama...stuck on stupid.
8 posted on 01/11/2010 12:03:31 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“The Obama administration is considering imposing a fee on banks to help recover some of taxpayers’ costs of bailing banks out from the financial crisis, according to multiple reports on Monday.

The White House said President Barack Obama wants to ensure that taxpayers are paid in full. “That’s the president’s goal,” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters. He declined to provide details on how that might be done.”

Hilarious. Yes, Obama, keep on helping those taxpayers out.


9 posted on 01/11/2010 12:03:58 PM PST by Voter62vb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Wasn’t this money paid back in full with interest? Just sayin...


10 posted on 01/11/2010 12:04:42 PM PST by Wright Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The banks would pass the fees to the customers but I guess in Obama’s book that wouldn't be a tax since the Government's not doing it.
11 posted on 01/11/2010 12:05:18 PM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
A fee which will, surely, be passed on to customers.

How stupid can these idiots get?

Charge a tax to pay a tax?

Never stops amazing me, the sheer stupidity of the morons that are in charge.

“Animal House” all over again!

12 posted on 01/11/2010 12:05:39 PM PST by cpa4you (CPA4YOU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wright Wing

Some of the banks have paid it back, but not all.

This is just another tax. He’s a complete idiot and is driving this country into the ground.


13 posted on 01/11/2010 12:06:20 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
President Barack Obama wants to ensure that taxpayers are paid in full. "That's the president's goal/ No, if he said that, then it is a lie.
14 posted on 01/11/2010 12:08:41 PM PST by ColdOne (ColdOne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

So a bank received $50 BILLION because it had inadequate financial reserves.

Just how much is this fee that it will pay back $50 BILLION without jeopardizing the bank that already has inadequate financial reserves?


15 posted on 01/11/2010 12:09:42 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Heres an idea, let the failing banks (CITICORP) fail and then let the successful banks win. For libs, think of it like abortion or Darwin. Practice what you preach.


16 posted on 01/11/2010 12:11:02 PM PST by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Whatever...it will be paid by customers anyway.


17 posted on 01/11/2010 12:12:39 PM PST by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

“The banks would pass the fees to the customers but I guess in Obama’s book that wouldn’t be a tax since the Government’s not doing it.”
_________________________________________________________
Indeed! Sneaky, aren’t they?


18 posted on 01/11/2010 12:14:09 PM PST by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Oh, the money THEY FORCED ON THE BANKS?

These people are utter a-holes.

19 posted on 01/11/2010 12:17:26 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Borrowers pay every dime of every expense dumped onto banks. Or savers get lower rates on their CDs, or both. There is no free lunch.

The reality is, it is deadbeats on mainstreet not paying banks what they owed them that made this mess in the first place, and they will pay them back, politics be damned. If they have to pay it as interest on government bonds the bank holds for a generation, or a quarter point higher rates, makes no difference.

Capital is paid in full or it evaporates and you lose its services. Law of nature. You can no more legislate it away than outlaw gravity.

20 posted on 01/11/2010 12:20:17 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson