Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California's unemployment rate stays steady at 12.4%
Los Angeles Times ^ | 1/22/10 | Alana Semeuls

Posted on 01/22/2010 11:16:35 AM PST by Baladas

California employers cut more workers from their staffs in December, capping a dismal year in which the state lost more than half a million jobs.

Payrolls shrank by 38,800 jobs last month, while the unemployment rate remained flat at 12.4% from the revised figure in November, which previously was pegged at 12.3%.

The state has the fifth-highest unemployment rate in the nation, after Michigan, Nevada, Rhode Island and South Carolina, and economists expect it to lag as the construction and retail sectors continue to struggle. Overall, the nation lost 85,000 jobs in December, but its unemployment rate remained at 10%.

Over the last two years, California has lost more than 1 million jobs.

"California is in worse shape than the country in a lot of ways," said Dan Seiver, an economics professor at San Diego State University. "It's probable that the recovery here might be even more sputtering than the nation as a whole."

The state's unemployment rate in December 2008 was 8.7%. In 2009, it jumped to double digits, where economists expect it to remain for this year.

The bursting of the housing bubble has flattened California's construction sector. California has shed more than 300,000 construction jobs -- nearly one-third of the industry's labor force -- since the sector peaked at 948,500 jobs in February 2006, according to state figures.

The state in 2009 probably set a record for the fewest homes produced in a single year since at least 1954, the California Building Industry Assn. said last month. Although the data are not yet final, the association forecast that 35,600 homes would be built in 2009, the lowest number since it began keeping track in 1954.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca; economy; immigration; unemploymentrate
Those numbers are much worse than they're spinning them, and if you read through the article, their big emphasis is on this affects (illegal?) immigrant workers. I wouldn't doubt if these numbers weren't "unexpectedly" adjusted soon, either.
1 posted on 01/22/2010 11:16:35 AM PST by Baladas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Over 480,000 NEW unemployment claoms were filed in one week and “85,000” jobs were lost last month???

I don’t get how this is possible.


2 posted on 01/22/2010 11:24:21 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

The state’s unemployment rate in December 2008 was 8.7%. In 2009, it jumped to double digits, where economists expect it to remain for this year.
.
.
.
How is that hope &change working out for you California ?


3 posted on 01/22/2010 11:24:24 AM PST by IrishMike (Liberalism is a psychological disorder and a dangerous mental illness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

We’re up to 15.8% here in Kern County.


4 posted on 01/22/2010 11:26:05 AM PST by umgud (I couldn't understand why the ball kept getting bigger......... then it hit me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

The most jobs were lost by New York, which saw 36,400 more jobless.

Texas was second-worst, losing 28,700 jobs. Florida followed with 23,500 more unemployed.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2434887/posts?page=9#9


5 posted on 01/22/2010 11:26:10 AM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

Is China Lake getting anything from BRAC?


6 posted on 01/22/2010 11:29:42 AM PST by SnuffaBolshevik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

>>>Over 480,000 NEW unemployment claoms were filed in one week and “85,000” jobs were lost last month???
I don’t get how this is possible.

The claims number is a gross number. The payroll number is a net number that takes into account hires in addition to lost jobs.


7 posted on 01/22/2010 11:31:38 AM PST by NC28203
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

See - the stimulus is working. :)

What are you worried about?


8 posted on 01/22/2010 11:35:54 AM PST by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

Here is a good interactive map of Calif

Unemployment in California

http://www.sacbee.com/1232/rich_media/1698037.html


9 posted on 01/22/2010 11:36:22 AM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Waste and fraud are synonymous with gov't spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
He now spends his days hustling for odd jobs outside the Home Depot in Hollywood, even in the rain.

I guess at The LA Times, everything shuts down for the rain. But out here in America, we have weather and we work in it!

10 posted on 01/22/2010 11:39:04 AM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

CA looses tax payers and gains parasites. In the meantime..the flow of illegals continues and nobody running for State wide office is talking about solving the number one fiscal problem..the expense of illegals.
Right now, I am planning on registering Rat and voting for Brown. I figure that Brown will finally bankrupt the state and force reform. All the other GOP people running are really gutless Rino’s who will just continue on the path of Arnold..trying to save the state with financial tricks and federal help..but not address the issue of benefits and education for illegals and cost of the bureaucracy.


11 posted on 01/22/2010 11:40:41 AM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

They should make a chart with govt versus private employment. Govt growing in numbers and pay..private falling with lower pay. That is the chart that would tell the big picture.
I wonder how much they spent and how many people maintain this wowwy chart?


12 posted on 01/22/2010 11:45:32 AM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NC28203
The claims number is a gross number. The payroll number is a net number that takes into account hires in addition to lost jobs.

I wonder how many of the hires were seasonal retail and delivery jobs for Christmas.

13 posted on 01/22/2010 11:48:38 AM PST by Wissa ("So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause."-Padme Amidala)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Gee, that is strange, both the Nation and CA lost more jobs in Dec(and most likely January)but the unemployment figures stayed “flat”. I call BS on that, JMO of course but still I call BS.


14 posted on 01/22/2010 11:48:43 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

The economy and unemployment are the Paramount concerns for voters, yet Barry and Rahm have spent the last year frittering with tackling non-existant global warming, a healthcare bill that no one on the left or the right wants, blaming Bush, making sophmoric jokes about Republicans and entertaining Domestic Terrorist Bill Ayers at the White House.


15 posted on 01/22/2010 11:52:03 AM PST by purplelobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

” I figure that Brown will finally bankrupt the state and force reform. “

LOL, I don’t know if I could bring myself to vote for him but I think you are onto something. I’ve said for quite sometime that the only thing that will straighten California out is total bankruptcy.I see now the dems want to resurrect single payer health care in Cali again. It’s as if we aren’t broke enough already.


16 posted on 01/22/2010 11:52:39 AM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Waste and fraud are synonymous with gov't spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: calex59
It may be in part because of people falling off the back-end of unemployment benefits (26-weeks), without having found work still. These people don't count towards the "official" unemployment figure anymore.

Check out this table from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (one that never seems to get any air-time in the media):

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t09.htm

The increase in "Unemployed - 27 weeks and over" from Nov 2009 to Dec 2009 was almost 230,000 (and a staggering 3,500,000 from Dec 2008). The month-to-month increase since Aug 2009 has been from 200,000 to 400,000.

But hey, the recession is over, or so Zero's folks tell me.

17 posted on 01/22/2010 12:20:10 PM PST by niteowl (Wisdom comes in two parts: 1) Having a lot to say, and 2) not saying it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: niteowl

But what’s the U6 number? How many have completely fallen out of the job market and are not counted?

One major national supplier is moving its operations from CA to Texas, shedding union jobs and high operational costs. The moving vans are headed out and will continue, especially with what’s coming out of Sacramento.


18 posted on 01/22/2010 12:28:44 PM PST by rstrahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson