“Prior to moving to Indonesia she had none of the foreign language experience, foreign living experience, scientific training or foreign policy education that I know the CIA would value from personal experience. Neither did her son, as his brief stay in Indonesia as a child where he never became fluent in the language, wouldn’t have impressed the CIA, even if it impressed the Democrats. “
You really are hung up on this...I repeat...CIA WILL USE ANYONE that suits their purpose for all kinds of things at anytime..anywhere...
Surely you understand that a fisherman with no education off in the wilds can work for the CIA..on an ongoing basis..if it suits their purpose. Men in suits (those that you are hung up on) can travel great lengths to track down someone to work for them if it suits their purpose.
The CIA hatched a plan..and used an uneducated criminal mafioso who has been in and out of prison.....through a cutout....in a plan to kill a foreign head of state....That’s no made up fantasy...It, in fact, happened.
And as a coincidence...someone involved with the Bay of Pigs invasion ,who is now exiled in the US, supposedly said that Obama’s father is a Cuban.
I intended my comments about Stanley Ann to be directed at whether or not she might be a knowning trained agent or asset of either the CIA or KGB, not an incidental or episodic asset.