“For Obama, his father was a British subject, and under British law at the time, Obama was a British subject as well.”
INCORRECT. I have posted about this ad nauseum and am not going to spend time going down this road again...just do research on illegitimate children and british law.
INCORRECT. I have posted about this ad nauseum and am not going to spend time going down this road again...just do research on illegitimate children and british law."
----------------------------
The state of HI believes it was a valid marriage:
Barry's Parents Divorce The 1964 divorce record from the Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit State of Hawaii, states that Stanley Ann D. Obama and Barack H. Obama "were lawfully married in Wailuku, Maui, State of Hawaii, on February 2, 1961, by a person duly authorized to perform marriage cerimonies and ever since that date have been and are now husband and wife." http://www.scribd.com/doc/18130289/Obama-1964-Divorce-Papers-13-Pages-Missing-Pg-11
If the state of HI says it's a valid marriage, then Barry would be a legitimate child and the 1948 BNA would apply.
Presumably, it would take another court hearing to overturn THAT court's findings. Sooooo....let there be discovery!