1 posted on
02/03/2010 2:20:13 PM PST by
eRtwngr
To: eRtwngr
..not to worry, Odumbo has called it in,or has he?
2 posted on
02/03/2010 2:21:58 PM PST by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
To: eRtwngr
IMO, they want everyone watching so that if they can successfully pull it off, it makes the feeling of being terrorized that much greater to the intended public target, because the public realizes that the governmental agencies can’t protect them from such harm.
3 posted on
02/03/2010 2:23:37 PM PST by
OB1kNOb
(I'd rather be over the hill than under it.)
To: eRtwngr
You might freeze some fish if it leaks but you are not going to be able to make LNG explode.
4 posted on
02/03/2010 2:26:05 PM PST by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: eRtwngr
To: eRtwngr
Tankers in a harbor would likely not be nearly spectacular enough for bloodthirsty dirtbag terrorists.
Those ships are big and very valuable, yet have tiny crews and contain very sophisticated fire suppression systems.
7 posted on
02/03/2010 2:37:56 PM PST by
Blue Jays
(Rock Hard, Ride Free)
To: eRtwngr
Relax.
Napolitano has eliminated the threat by outlawing BBQs within 200 miles of the barges.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.9 posted on
02/03/2010 2:40:46 PM PST by
The Comedian
(Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson