Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tcrlaf
I have posted often on the danger George Soros represents. Without considering whether he exercises more control over the Democrat party than Andy Stern, there is no doubt he is a malevolent influence. Here is an old post of mine on the subject:

The problem is that all the levers of political power , with few exceptions, are in his hands. The article points out how he controls Democrat money through a series of 527 sham entities. It is not just Soros' own money or the money of his own trusts, he now has control of virtually all the money flowing into the Democrat party. In addition, he's well on his way to controlling most of the money that gets donated to political campaigns or is detoured into 527s. That means the pickings get smaller for Republicans.

Combine this with the ability of Obama to shake down our major corporations and trade organizations out of sheer fear of what he will do to them, and you have even more money diverted. It need not be said that in addition to a financial shakedown, Obama has already demonstrated his ability to move these entities into his support column even when the support his radical program is clearly not in their interests. One need only name AARP or the American Medical Association to give an idea of the grave threat presented on this front.

But the threat posed by Soros is not limited to the money he controls. By virtue of his control of MoveOn.org and Huffington Post and so forth, he has a great deal of power over the Internet. We already know that Obama does not need much power over the conventional media outlets because he already has it.

As demonstrated in the last election, the Soros groups can put boots on the ground in virtually any precinct he chooses and he has great resources to mobilize a rent-a- mob to disrupt town hall meetings and to discredit tea party patriots by making them look aggressive.

We have seen bosses controlling patronage and ethnic groups throughout American history but the scope of their influence has usually been limited to cities or occasionally to a state or even a few states. In Soros we see the embodiment of bossism spanning the entire nation.

When one combines this kind of power in a Marxist in a world in which there is virtually no institutional check or balance, the threat to the republic is apparent. How much can one expect of Blue Dog Democrats when they know that they will get no money for their own campaign but instead will be confronted in a primary challenge by a well-funded Soros loyalist and overwhelmed by a wave of foot soldiers? Just as no one could stand up to the bosses of Tammany Hall, no elected official will be able to stand up against George Soros if he decides to turn the screws.


20 posted on 02/05/2010 12:45:06 PM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

NB, considering the way the Mccain campaign refused to attack, do you think Soros may have had control of both 08 campaigns?


23 posted on 02/05/2010 12:50:56 PM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson