Posted on 02/09/2010 9:39:57 PM PST by smoothsailing
As far as I can tell, Sarah Palin is the only national figure with both the moral authority and platform to educate the American public on the real reasons our economy is where it is. I hope she can pull it off.
“The proof of the latter point was made with the evidence that many important Washington Republicans could never support her for more than cheerleader to her marginal people.”......and those important Washington Republicans are....
Good stuff. Seems like the news is more fun lately.
And "We win, you lose."
:)
baraq’s misinformation czar is hard at work
Don't forget how illegal immigration has totally stripped our healthcare funds in virtually every state. But, oops, can she mention that while campaigning with Juan?
Add this article to my post on the following thread for your comments: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2447985/posts?page=54#54
i see harry is wearing his ‘barry blue’ tie
The mayor of San Francisco in 1966 was a Republican? What a different world that was.
LOL.
Excellent point GBC. Until the actual cause of our economic woe is addressed, i.e., political corruption mostly on the Left and their brown shirts, the Marxist Community Organizations, we will not be able to correct the problems. That is why the Tea Party has become a force! Many Americans know the root cause but have not had the power to address the perps. Hopefully we will make our voices heard in Nov!
That is Sarah Palin.
The American people have had a belly full of new ideas in the last year. The next winning politician and party will only have to offer two "new ideas": Stop it now! (and) Start rolling it back immediately! It may take decades just to execute those two new ideas.
Is anyone in the GOP listening? We don't want bipartisanship, we want a stop to this madness.
The conservatives of yesteryear were judged on their substance, now they are judged on their style.
Oh Bullsh*t!
Your Palin bias is showing.
You so-objective and so-concerned posters are anything but objective. Next time, read the article instead of just the title before you comment so you don't embarrass yourself.
Blankley described in long detail the substance of Sarah's speech. And then he concluded by saying the substance of Sarah's speech was deleted with "sparkle and sincerity".
Who, you or Blank, is the true master in the art of self-deception.
Reagan had sparkle, warmth, and substance.
So does Sarah Palin.
You really should read the article.
Sarah has both style and substance.... that is what makes her so frightening to the Left and the Rinos. Run,Sarah,Run; Drill, baby, Drill. We have enough resources to satisfy our needs and then some. An effort to recover those resources and put them to use will provides jobs, lots of jobs. Think, exploration, recovery, transportation, refining, distribution and the necessary technology for all of the previous. It will end our financial nightmare AND our dependence on people who want to kill us. WIN, WIN. Sarah has more experience in dealing with oil companies, environmentalists, and crooked pols, than anyone in either party. AND she has had remarkable success in dealing with all of them. In fact, some of the crooked pols she encountered, in her own party, are currently guests of the state, attired in orange jumpsuits, thanks to Sarah. Think of the fun she’d have in Washington.
Then, when I point out to you that Blankley's article was really judging Sarah on substance AND style, you move the bar and change your argument to, (said in a high pitched, concerned voice) "well he is judging her on substance but his judgement on Palin's substance is incorrect".
LOL!
And if I were to take the time to show your latest point to be incorrect, I'm sure you will move the bar again.
LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.