[FreeReign]

First you argue, basing your argument on the title, that Blankley was judging Sarah based on style and not substance.

Ben Ficklin | Post 1:Sparkle and warmth fall under the category of style. The conservatives of yesteryear were judged on their substance, now they are judged on their style.

Then, when I point out to you that Blankley's article was really judging Sarah on substance AND style, you move the bar and change your argument to, (said in a high pitched, concerned voice) "well he is judging her on substance but his judgement on Palin's substance is incorrect".

Ben Ficklin | Post 2:Who, you or Blank, is the true master in the art of self-deception.

LOL!

And if I were to take the time to show your latest point to be incorrect, I'm sure you will move the bar again.

LOL!

[HalfFull]

Then moderate state Assemblyman Caspar Weinberger told the New York Times that "Christopher will do much better than Rockefeller did. Reagan will get the great bulk of the Goldwater support, but it does not represent much more than one-third of the party."

As we all know, similar quotes can be found even on FR Palin threads today!

[Ben Ficklin]

So which should I believe?

Governor Palin's substantive position on global warming or candidate Palin's populist rhetoric on GW?

Another big problem for the PalinBots is the fact that Palin's most substantive actions in Alaska are on the verge of being undone.

When this problem in Alaska was pointed out to the PalinBots in 2008 you accused them of being Palin haters. Is the new Alaska governor a Palin hater?