Posted on 02/10/2010 10:54:16 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
If there was ever any doubt that Sarah Palin is a fool, she has removed it.
Once the governor of Alaska and a vice presidential candidate, Palin has left the confines of public office for the more sympathetic offices of Fox News.
She has also been acting as something of a de facto leader of the Tea Party movement.
Unfortunately, her new roles have not lent her the gravitas she was lacking as a politician.
...
Palin has consistently shown herself to be thoughtless, uninformed, impulsive and opportunistic. If these are the qualities people look for in a leader, then this country has bigger troubles than the economy or war.
Palin hasn't ruled out a run for president in 2012. If conservatives truly want to end Obama's reign, we suggest that she is the wrong opponent to match against him.
(Excerpt) Read more at 2.insidenova.com ...
We’ll see what these people have to say when every candidate palin endorses wins in the 2010 elections.
I agree, and wouldn’t have bothered, except that he did ask. Also, this guy isn’t an idiot, and I was pretty surprised at this editorial, and told him so, and that’s what started this.
No, there’s no need, but since I was asked if I would write a response column, I thought I should at least consider it.
Thanks. Is it OK with you if I steal a line or two from this if I write my column? I’ve tried to make that argument but I think I like some of your wording better.
"...For a woman called a fool, they sure are in paranoid fear of her..."
You are precisely 100% correct. That is why Americans laugh at the mainstream media.
Moonbat journalists can't write a straight thought about Governor Palin without falling all over themselves.
Their screeching opinions often oppose each other...even in the same article!
It's situations like this that call to mind the eight stupid bastards that fired Rush Limbaugh.
She can answer a question off the cuff without having to scroll back through her speech to reiterate the talking point. It is nice to see someone who has the ability to speak from the heart and mean it.
About “retard” and Rush, Palin says she listens to him. That means she gets him. Your editors don’t.
I have had many letters published and frequently comment on the paper's website. I feel that it is my responsibility to try and counter the crap printed in my local paper. The irritating part is that even when one is confronted with outrageous nonsense one still has to remember that the editors hold all the cards. If you said everything you really wanted to... they will not publish it and they will often delete even your comments from the web page. At times it still feels good to let them know how you really feel, unfortunately you can only tell them you are canceling your subscription so many times before they figure that one out.
(((PING)))
“work for” is really a misnomer in the field of free-lance opinion columns. In 2004, the paper dropped a conservative writer and another one quit, and a friend of mine wrote to the staff and suggested they consider me as a replacement (I wasn’t writing editorials then, but I was active on an e-mail group where we discussed politics and local issues).
So now I send them a column, and get paid a pittance for it. And I get to say I’m a writer. My qualifications were that I can write complete sentences, and live locally.
The current editor isn’t the guy who first accepted me, he’s a young guy on the liberal/libertarian side of things, who usually does a better job of explaining and supporting his positions, even when he is dead wrong.
But I don’t really work for him, I just get a chance to put something conservative in the paper once a week and get lunch money for it. It’s a good gig, so long as I don’t think about how long it takes to actually write the column.
The key to making real money in opinion writing is to get syndicated, so you can get paid 100 times for the same column. That’s not going to happen for me.
The editorial certainly qualifies as “opinion”, being totally fact-free.
This and a perusal of today’s Houston Chronicle while at the doctor’s office remind me that most “newspapers” are not fit for toilet paper, let alone reading.
I disagree. "Stupid" should hurt. And it's our duty to "bring on the pain."
It wasn't really harsh, it was just juvenile. They need to pay some attention to the news before they try to reference it, the Limbaugh mistake they made was inexcusably ignorant and comparing the most bizarre and constant use of teleprompters that we have ever seen to someone inking six words on there palm, or even having a stack of index cards to refer to, is just juvenile.
Shouldn't something this trivial be in chat?
One thing I deeply respect about my wife is her insistence on using her "palm pilot" as she calls it. I've tried to buy her the gadgets, but she insists her way is "good enough," and those that don't like it can go to hell.
Pretty good for a doddering, old fool. Sarah will do it too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.