To: Dubya
There is significant legal scholarship indicating that in fact the Constitution does NOT mandate “birthright citizenship.” People should look at the meaning of “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” in the 14th Amendment and the legislative history.
3 posted on
02/17/2010 11:45:16 AM PST by
cvq3842
(A fool and his liberty are soon parted.)
To: cvq3842
The 14th Amendment is not part of the “basic” Constitution as the author of the blog claimed.
I’m not saying toss the Amendment out, but he acted as if being born here even when your parents have no claims to citizenship still makes you a full blooded American (and legally able to petition to have your parents establish citizenship) which is a stretch.
8 posted on
02/17/2010 11:55:19 AM PST by
a fool in paradise
(DON'T SAY "Happy Valentines' Day". It's Happy Holidays! This is the Holiday Season (Prez Day Feb15))
To: cvq3842
Indeed ... the story glosses over or ignores a lot of history. Just say NO to anchor babies.
24 posted on
02/17/2010 12:31:17 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
("Roll back Pelosi" Rush Limbaugh, 2/12/10)
To: cvq3842
Correct, according to the 14th amendment they are not citizens, unless subject to the jurisdiction of the US. Why are they being given citizenship?
44 posted on
02/17/2010 2:02:00 PM PST by
greeneyes
(Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
To: cvq3842
There is significant legal scholarship indicating that in fact the Constitution does NOT mandate birthright citizenship. People should look at the meaning of and subject to the jurisdiction thereof in the 14th Amendment and the legislative history. Exactly.
54 posted on
02/18/2010 5:59:00 AM PST by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson