Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blackwater Took Hundreds of Guns From U.S. Military, Afghan Police
The Washington Independent ^ | ScottMerge

Posted on 02/23/2010 7:40:56 PM PST by ScottMerge

Employees of the CIA-connected private security corporation Blackwater diverted hundreds of weapons, including more than 500 AK-47 assault rifles, from a U.S. weapons bunker in Afghanistan intended to equip Afghan policemen, according to an investigation by the Senate Armed Services Committee. On at least one occasion, an individual claiming to work for the company evidently signed for a weapons shipment using the name of a “South Park” cartoon character. And Blackwater has yet to return hundreds of the guns to the military.

A Blackwater subsidiary known as Paravant that until recently operated in Afghanistan acquired the weapons for its employees’ “personal use,” according to committee staffers, as did other non-Paravant employees of Blackwater. Yet contractors in Afghanistan are not permitted to operate weapons without explicit permission from U.S. Central Command, something Blackwater never obtained. A November 2008 email from a Paravant vice president named Brian McCracken, obtained by the committee, nevertheless reads: “We have not received formal permission from the Army to carry weapons yet but I will take my chances.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonindependent.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 200811; afghanistan; afghanpolice; ak47s; blackwater; brianmccracken; civiliancontractors; mccracken; paravant; southpark; war; xe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: ScottMerge

Yah. and that’s what they were used for. So what?


21 posted on 02/23/2010 10:03:40 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

Is ‘So What’ your catch phrase or something?

There’s no need to be partisan about this, they did something they shouldn’t have. You can’t possibly think taking guns meant for US soldiers and Afghan police under false names is a good idea


22 posted on 02/23/2010 10:42:37 PM PST by ScottMerge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Karliner

ROTFLOL!


23 posted on 02/23/2010 10:47:17 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ScottMerge

bttt


24 posted on 02/24/2010 1:29:29 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottMerge
they did something they shouldn’t have

By whose standard?

A-stan is a hot zone. The military contracts for services, yet quite often the military are on their collective a$$ when it comes to giving the tools needed to accomplish these contracted services.

I'm no fan of BW & Co., but they did what needed to be done in order to fulfill their contract.

25 posted on 02/24/2010 2:24:10 AM PST by Sarajevo (You're jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ScottMerge; Ramius
There’s no need to be partisan about this, they did something they shouldn’t have. You can’t possibly think taking guns meant for US soldiers and Afghan police under false names is a good idea

You don't know they did it. You(and me)only have this one news item that says Blackwater did this. Since Blackwater is on the liberal's hit list, I find any article that puts them in a bad light very suspicious. Was this Blackwater as a whole or a few individuals. Did the weapons actually go missing and, if so, were the perps actually Blackwater. I see no proof in the article only allegations. Until they actually prove Blackwater, as a company, stole these weapons I will reserve judgement on them.

BTW, AK47s were never meant to be issued to US troops, we have our own weapons, usually the M4 or some squad weapon, not AKs.

26 posted on 02/24/2010 6:24:54 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson