Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul: ‘No’ on Census Support
The Wall Street Journal ^ | 03/08/2010 | Jean Spencer

Posted on 03/10/2010 11:57:08 AM PST by speciallybland

Rep. Ron Paul was the single “no” vote on a resolution last week to support participation in the 2010 Census.

In a weekly column on his Web site, the Texas Republican said the census “has grown far beyond what the framers of our Constitution intended.”

He said the government has no business collecting personal information such as ethnicity, income and religious affiliation and categorizing people into groups. “From a constitutional perspective, of course, the answer to each of these questions is: ‘None of your business,’” Paul said. “But the bigger question is — why government is so intent on compiling this information in the first place?”

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 111th; 2010census; census; census2010; illegalimmigration; lping; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 03/10/2010 11:57:08 AM PST by speciallybland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: speciallybland
“But the bigger question is — why government is so intent on compiling this information in the first place?”

Why indeed...information is power.

2 posted on 03/10/2010 11:59:41 AM PST by highlander_UW (Obama has lost or not saved over 4 million jobs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

I completely agree with Paul in this case however I will fill out my census form....in as much as the Constitution requires me to.


3 posted on 03/10/2010 12:00:47 PM PST by Grunthor (Everyone hates the U.S. at least until they need liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead; speciallybland

Ping...


4 posted on 03/10/2010 12:04:39 PM PST by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub. III OK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

It's a shame Ron Paul was the lone "No" vote. If we're to believe the government propaganda in the TV and radio ads, the government needs to know how to discriminate against us with our own money. Who's got their hands out the most?

Of course it's more than that, they want to know every aspect of our lives so they can control us.

5 posted on 03/10/2010 12:05:38 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Every time I hear the stupid census commercials, I get livid.

At the end of every commercial it states something about the census being the way to get your fair share of money.

That was never the intent of the census.


6 posted on 03/10/2010 12:05:45 PM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

“It’s rather unusual for a lawmaker to speak against the census because the headcount is the basis for allotting the 435 House seats and residents are required by law to participate, said...”
It isn’t the head count anyone is objecting to, you stupid statist swine.
By the way, the feds are wasting more money. We got a letter from the govt telling us that we would be getting the census letter in about a week. Real good. I’d know I got the census when it showed up.


7 posted on 03/10/2010 12:08:57 PM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
I only answered the questions that I felt were Constitutional... to do anything else is capitulation.

LLS

8 posted on 03/10/2010 12:09:11 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Wolverine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

What’s the best way to legally cover yourself with the census.

Last time, I just ignored the thing until ACORN just got sick of knocking on my door.


9 posted on 03/10/2010 12:09:26 PM PST by wilco200 (11/4/08 - The Day America Jumped the Shark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom

2 people live here. That’s all they get from me.
If pressed read me my miranda rights. I have the right to remain silent if threatened with arrest or fine.


10 posted on 03/10/2010 12:09:47 PM PST by manonCANAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: manonCANAL

I keep on wondering if I should add our native american indian heritage.

(It’s true, but so far back in my ancestry that I don’t even know.)


11 posted on 03/10/2010 12:12:10 PM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

Gotta agree with the crazy old goat on this one.


12 posted on 03/10/2010 12:13:29 PM PST by TADSLOS (Tea Party. We are the party of NO! NO to more government! NO to more spending! NO to more taxation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

Ron Paul is correct on this....In other matters he’s an idiot.


13 posted on 03/10/2010 12:16:36 PM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

Religious affiliation?
They are asking religious affiliation?


14 posted on 03/10/2010 12:23:16 PM PST by kalee (The offences we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we engrave in marble. J Huett 1658)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

yet another issue on which I am in full agreement with Ron Paul


15 posted on 03/10/2010 12:28:47 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
It's a shame Ron Paul was the lone "No" vote.

Lemme guess.... this is the part where we'll start seeing the "Ron Paul -- even a stopped clock is right twice a day!" type posts.

Never mind that, if one added up all the issues on which Ron Paul is right, it's more like he's a "stopped clock" that's right 22 or 23 hours a day...

16 posted on 03/10/2010 12:31:37 PM PST by Christian_Capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Drango

He’s actually frustratingly right on a fair amount of stuff—and disastrously wrong on too much else!


17 posted on 03/10/2010 12:31:51 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Christian_Capitalist

I’m only going to answer the questions that I feel were mandated by the Constitution!


18 posted on 03/10/2010 12:37:18 PM PST by Paddy Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

Under Roe v Wade we have a constitutional right to privacy.

If the government wants to violate that civil right they must meet a much higher standard than, they just want to know.


19 posted on 03/10/2010 12:43:10 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Is there a fine for not filling out all the answers?
I don’t like the intrusive questions either.


20 posted on 03/10/2010 12:44:05 PM PST by tractorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson