Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bruinator
She wasn’t that attractive. Only the title made her appear that way. She was rather crane like and dorky with a slighly oversized breathing apperatus.

I never cared for her looks, either. I guess being "royal" gives one some bonus points in the looks department.

39 posted on 03/11/2010 2:08:17 PM PST by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Sans-Culotte
What, you saying Charles ain't a hunk?

I never thought she was a beautiful as she was made out to be, but in terms of looks, she was way out of his league. Course, having six castles and being heir to the throne of England probably made him a little more desirable.

49 posted on 03/11/2010 2:18:45 PM PST by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson