Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Longbow1969

Rachel Maddow vs Scott Brown.....you got to be kidding.....Rachel is a Obama shill......and no one watches her on MSNBC....she does her best to name drop and throw charges and O’Reilly and Beck, but they won’t even mention her name or respond......she is a sad sad liberal and would be CRUSHED in any election bid.


23 posted on 03/23/2010 3:27:38 PM PDT by 2010Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: 2010Freeper

She has to run. With Comcast buying NBC hosts will now have to earn their keep. By running she has an excuse to bow out before being canceled due to low ratings.


26 posted on 03/23/2010 3:35:59 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: 2010Freeper

“Rachel Maddow vs Scott Brown.....you got to be kidding.....Rachel is a Obama shill......and no one watches her on MSNBC....she does her best to name drop and throw charges and O’Reilly and Beck, but they won’t even mention her name or respond......she is a sad sad liberal and would be CRUSHED in any election bid.”

Oh really? Perhaps you have not been paying attention to whom the people of Massachusetts regularly vote?

I give you exhibit A)

Barney Frank

I give you exhibit B)

The Massachusetts House of Representatives currently has 144 Democrats and a whopping 16 Republicans.

Yes, Rachel Maddow is most definitely the kind of candidate who would be attractive to a majority of Massachusetts voters.

It’s sad, but it is what it is.


28 posted on 03/23/2010 3:38:03 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson