Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s rhetorical shift on health care
washington examiner ^ | 3/25/10 | Mary Katharine Ham

Posted on 03/25/2010 7:26:44 PM PDT by Nachum

You’ll be glad to know that, like with the Obama presidency before it, we have now moved from the “everything will miraculously change” portion of the Obama health-care pitch to the “I never said everything would miraculously change” portion.

This comes from his speech selling health-care reform in Iowa today:

Now, it will take about four years to implement this entire plan – because we need to do it responsibly and we need to get it right. That means that health care costs won’t go down overnight. But we have built into the law all sorts of measures to assure that in years to come, health care inflation, which has been rising about three times as fast as people’s wages, will start slowing. We’ll start reducing the waste in the system, from unnecessary tests to unwarranted insurance subsidies. So over time, Americans will save money.

He kindly advised the GOP to “go for it,” on their attempts to repeal the bill, proving he’s just reading the polling numbers and offering kind, post-partisan advice to the caucus.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: health; obamas; rhetorical; shift

1 posted on 03/25/2010 7:26:44 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Open letter to all the Sammy and Sylvia Sobstories out there:

Do you have more and better health care NOW than you did last week?

If his plan was so great, why did the Rats delay the implementation of key components of this bill for 3, 4, 5, and even 8 years?

One more set of questions, if you are in trouble and your freedom is in jeopardy and need a lawyer, would you rather have the best private lawyer you can afford or would you rather have a government appointed attorney who may be half drunk when he shows up for your trial?

Then why would you want a GOVERNMENT APPOINTED DOCTOR in a GOVERNMENT RUN HOSPITAL when your LIFE may hang in the balance?


2 posted on 03/25/2010 7:38:56 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The US will not die with a whimper. It will die with thundering applause from the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I have never seen anything so divisive out of a president than his sore-winner mocking in Iowa today of those who oppose the monstrosity just passed.
He is the divider in chief. The only thing I remember even close to what I saw today was when LBJ called congressmen who opposed Vietnam escalation “Nervous Nellies”.


3 posted on 03/25/2010 7:48:10 PM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great... ...until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

4 posted on 03/25/2010 7:50:00 PM PDT by garjog (Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
or would you rather have a government appointed attorney who may be half drunk when he shows up for your trial?

Or a public defender like the stuttering fool in "My Cousin Vinny"?

5 posted on 03/25/2010 7:50:14 PM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great... ...until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“crossing the lines in terms of unconstitutionality”

State of Illinois
92nd General Assembly
Regular Session
Senate Transcript March 30, 2001

Page 87

http://www.ilga.gov/senate/transcripts/strans92/ST033001.pdf

Obama “And if we’re placing a burden on the doctor that says you have to keep alive even a previable child as long as possible and give them as much medical attention as — as is necessary to keep that child alive, then we’re probably crossing the lines in terms of unconstitutionality.”

Allowing Obama’s logic for a moment;

‘placing a burden on the doctor to keep alive even a previable child is probably crossing the lines in terms of unconstitutionality’

^
‘placing a burden on the citizen to pay even a health insurance policy is probably crossing the lines in terms of unconstitutionality’


6 posted on 03/25/2010 8:05:42 PM PDT by Son House ("Warning! Warning!" "That does not compute" "Danger, Will Robinson!""Oh, the pain...the pain!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Migraine

I can’t tell if we have a mentally ill president?

Or a downright evil president?

I suppose it could be some combination of the two - but whatever it is, there’s going to be alot of damage by the time he’s finished.


7 posted on 03/25/2010 8:20:15 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

LOL Selling healthcare.


8 posted on 03/25/2010 8:24:20 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

He’s bats and evil.


9 posted on 03/25/2010 9:29:28 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson