Lipinski Lonely But Proud To Be Pro-Life Democrat

Chicago Tribune ^ | March 28, 2010 | John Kass

[Gadsden1st]

Can’t trust a Democrat. One of the ones given permission to vote NO cause they had enough??? Now spin to save his seat (@$$).

[edpc]

He can always go back to skating.

[raptor22]

Lipinski voted no both times. He is consistently pro-life.

[raptor22]

Lipinski voted no both times. He is consistently pro-life.

[PGalt]

There is no such thing as a pro-life socialist/progressive/totalitarian/collectivist/’rat.

It(he) is an oxymoron. A bundle of deception and/or contradictions.

[Gaffer]

Still a DEMOCRAT, still a LIAR. Vote his ass out in November, period!

[pepperdog]

Oh poo, he voted No because the evil witch of the West told him he could.

[WackySam]

Lipinski voted no both times. He is consistently pro-life.

Who cares? If his only objection to Obamacare is abortion funding he is still the enemy and needs to go.

[all the best]

He may be anti-abortion but he is not pro-life. Statism is death to individuals. In many ways and on all levels. Statists are anti-life.

[Gen.Blather]

If your team decides it wants something you personally don’t want, then you aren’t a team player. You will not be trusted by your teammates. You can’t play the game alone. So, you either switch teams or you quit the game. But us voters can’t afford to elect individuals who support our views when it’s the team that sets the agenda.

[raptor22]

Isn’t that enough? I care. I care about the unborn, some of whom will grow up to be Democrats.

[whershey]

Just what I was thinking.

[Paradox]

Isn’t that enough? I care. I care about the unborn, some of whom will grow up to be Democrats.

Is it enough? I don't know, what if Obama had needed this guys vote, would he have pulled a Stupak? I'd hope not, but these days, I don't think there are any Democrats with any real convictions.

[Night Hides Not]

Lipinski voted no both times. He is consistently pro-life.

I'll bet he voted for Pelosi as Speaker.

[Night Hides Not]

Is it enough? I don't know, what if Obama had needed this guys vote, would he have pulled a Stupak? I'd hope not, but these days, I don't think there are any Democrats with any real convictions.

Stupak proved that there is no such thing as a "good" Democrat. After his cave-in, I vowed that I would never vote for a Democrat as long as I live.

Doesn't mean I'll automatically pull the lever for the other party, but the Democrats are dead to me.

[WackySam]

Isn’t that enough? I care. I care about the unborn, some of whom will grow up to be Democrats.

No, it's not enough. If that's his only objection to the healthcare bill he's still the enemy.

[erman]

He was "ALLOWED" to vote no.

his fellow democrat scum would have made some lame non binding camouflage piece of paper to fake out his constituents.

[raptor22]

You don’t have to have a beer with the guy or even vote for him, but give credit where and when credit is due. Before stupid Stupak sold out, we were all cheering him on, whether he was a Democrat or not. When the Judge of us all calls the roll, He will not ask whether we were for buying insurance across state lines. He will ask what we did or tried to do for the unborn.

[calex59]

The only reason he voted no was because they had the votes all figured out before hand. There is no such thing as a pro-life democrat.