Palin knows how to answer a direct question. THAT is obviously a rare and positive quality in a politician. I say this because so few politicians (many with more extensive experience and shrewder PR skills than hers) who are able or willing to do so.
Also, Palin knows how to get on topic and stay there. Lesser politicians cannot resist artfully straying to their particular and personal pet topics...and they invariably do so with the jejune and supercilious conviction that it is unnoticed by viewers or readers. There’s enough insolence there to choke the whole stable.
Finally, Palin knows how to make a sentence with a subject and a predicate. Try finding other life time politicians of any stripe who can boast THAT talent!!
When she is finished, I know EXACTLY what she said.
You are right about Sarah. She speaks in complete and grammatical sentences that are direct to the point and make sense. That is a rare quality. It indicates that she thinks clearly. Her delivery also indicates honesty. What she thinks comes right out without pauses for guile.
If I lived in Arizona, I’d vote for J. D. Hayworth. I’d love to see him in the Senate. Nonetheless, I give Sarah a pass on her support of Juan McPain. She simply thinks she owes him one and she pays her debts.
As for Zero’s vaunted IQ, he is clever like any Con Man is clever. He clearly knows little about history, geography, or economics - except as filtered through a Marxist prism.
He also doesn’t know how to run anything except his mouth, and finally he doesn’t know how to catch a fish or skin a moose - and those are skills not to be despised.