Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: highlander_UW

Only if he is wearing a kilt and playing the pipes.


5 posted on 04/06/2010 8:12:16 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: jacquej
Only if he is wearing a kilt and playing the pipes.

I'm no lawyer, but it seems to me that he could fight that charge pretty easily. Here is the Webster's online dictionary definition for Riot...:

2 a : public violence, tumult, or disorder b : a violent public disorder; specifically : a tumultuous disturbance of the public peace by three or more persons assembled together and acting with a common intent

It takes 3 or more to make a riot. One might be guilty of disorderly conduct, but without accomplices one can not be partaking in a riot.

and if they argue that the law doesn't require 3 or more one can argue that the law is based upon a revised interpretation of the English language. Ignorance of the law may be no defense, but ignorance of the unique revision of the English language might.

6 posted on 04/06/2010 8:17:15 PM PDT by highlander_UW (Remember in November...vote the bums out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson