Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Still Gets More Blame Than Obama for the Economy
Politics Daily ^ | April 21, 2010 | Bruce Drake

Posted on 04/22/2010 2:53:01 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin

Although President Obama has been in the White House for over a year, more Americans still blame former President Bush for the country's economic problems than they do Obama, according to a Gallup poll conducted March 26-28.

Seventy-five percent blamed Bush a "great deal" or "moderate amount" compared to 50 percent who put responsibility on Obama (these figures include people who blame both). Taking the "great deal" category alone, 42 percent blame Bush a great deal compared to 26 percent who blame Obama.

The percentage of those who blame Obama a great deal is up from 14 percent compared to last July, but Bush's number hasn't changed much from his 43 percent figure last summer. The number of those who blamed Obama a moderate amount rose from 18 percent to 24 percent.

Along party lines, 26 percent of Democrats blame Obama a great deal or moderate amount and 75 percent either not much or not at all. Ninety percent blame Bush a great deal or moderate amount with 10 percent not blaming him much or at all.

Seventy-seven percent of Republicans blame Obama a great deal or moderate amount, with 23 percent not blaming him much or at all. Fifty-seven percent of Republicans put some measure of blame on Bush (although only 15 percent are in the "great deal" category) while 43 percent do not blame him much or at all anymore.

Fifty percent of independents blame Obama a great deal or moderate amount, while 49 percent blame him not much or not at all. Seventy-seven percent still blame Bush, while 24 percent blame him not much or at all.

"Theoretically, Obama accumulates more responsibility for the nation's economy every day he's in office," Gallup said. "That could bear down increasingly hard on his approval rating if unemployment continues to hold at or near 10% and consumer attitudes remain negative. However, the big upside is that should the economy rebound on his watch -- and recent Gallup tracking has some signs of a "nascent" recovery -- Obama is poised to receive much of the credit."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
"However, the big upside is that should the economy rebound on his watch -- and recent Gallup tracking has some signs of a 'nascent' recovery -- Obama is poised to receive much of the credit."

ROFLMAO! Sure.

1 posted on 04/22/2010 2:53:01 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Just when does Obama pick up the blame game ball?.....


2 posted on 04/22/2010 2:56:03 PM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

When is there going to be a poll question concerning Democrat controlled since 2006, Congress for putting the U.S. into recession. Guess they don’t want to risk the answer.


3 posted on 04/22/2010 3:00:20 PM PDT by pacpam (action=consequence and applies in all cases - friend of victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

15 months and counting, Barry


4 posted on 04/22/2010 3:11:48 PM PDT by silverleaf (Karl Marx was NOT one of America's Founding Fathers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacpam
"When is there going to be a poll question concerning Democrat controlled since 2006"

That job falls on us, we have to educate everyone we can as to the roll of congress in this mess and who has been in charge sense way before the recession started.
5 posted on 04/22/2010 3:12:29 PM PDT by JoSixChip (You think your having a bad day?.....Somewhere out there is a Mr. Pelosi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

W had a whole eight years to screw up the economy. Obama, just more than a year.


6 posted on 04/22/2010 3:15:55 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
"Just when does Obama pick up the blame game ball?....."

He is too busy picking up the golf ball instead.

7 posted on 04/22/2010 3:21:01 PM PDT by Infralutheran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
26 percent of Democrats blame Obama ... 75 percent either not much or not at all. Ninety percent blame Bush ... 10 percent not blaming him much or at all.

Seventy-seven percent of Republicans blame Obama ... with 23 percent not blaming him much or at all.

Fifty-seven percent of Republicans put some measure of blame on Bush

And there you have it folks ... republicans are stoooopid!
Unless the majority of those claiming to be republicans are really liberaltarians.

8 posted on 04/22/2010 3:22:00 PM PDT by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
I don't have the exact quote, but Neal Boortz was right when he said the real danger is we have a populous stupid enough to elect "the Messiah" in the first place.

Elect a person because he says change and "yes we can"? It is sickness.

9 posted on 04/22/2010 3:24:21 PM PDT by Stepan12 (Palin & Bolton in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Seventy-five percent blamed Bush a "great deal" or "moderate amount" compared

Hi DIW. My family doesn't. IMHO the real reason for the financial crisis is not yet defined. Some time ago a FReeper posted a quote by a congressman during a C-Span interview who indicated that over 500 billion dollars was withdrawn from the money markets over a period of 3-5 hours. He indicated that we didn't know who / what was behind the run on the funds. While there was lots of rot in the financial system, this event is what triggered the crisis. We need to find out who was behind the run.

10 posted on 04/22/2010 3:31:09 PM PDT by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody

Bush tried to regulate Fannie and Freddie. Although the Republicans had narrow majorities in Congress, they were not enough to prevent the Democrats from blocking the reforms.


11 posted on 04/22/2010 3:31:17 PM PDT by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62; All

12 posted on 04/22/2010 3:32:47 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save the Earth. It's the only planet with Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nuc1
Some time ago a FReeper posted a quote by a congressman during a C-Span interview who indicated that over 500 billion dollars was withdrawn from the money markets over a period of 3-5 hours.

I've never seen a source besides that congressman. For some reason, that makes me suspicious.

13 posted on 04/22/2010 3:33:17 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

W had a whole eight years to screw up the economy. Obama, just more than a year.

better watch it becuase the lame stream media will run that as obummer is 8 times the president that W was.....


14 posted on 04/22/2010 3:33:56 PM PDT by Cyclone59 (I ROCK, Guitar Hero said so........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Why not blame the Democratic congress who have had control of both the house and senate for the last four years. They now control the legislative branch an the executive branch, yet they still want to blame Bush. The American public is getting wise to this mess.


15 posted on 04/22/2010 3:36:59 PM PDT by political1 (Love your neighbors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody

Bush tripled the debt on his watch that is a fact. He never said no to any spending in like the first 6 years. Of course Obama tripled the debt heading to 4 times in 15 months and shows no signs of stopping. It is not compassionate to spend more than you take in no matter who is overseeing the spending.


16 posted on 04/22/2010 3:37:36 PM PDT by vicar7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
How about a
-- RAT CONGRESS SINCE 2006 --

17 posted on 04/22/2010 3:42:00 PM PDT by Blado (Quo Warranto, Bambi? (Disclaimer- all criticism is of white male half only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vicar7

I agree. Bush was not fiscally responsible. He failed to fund the wars with offsetting budget cuts or tax increases. He exploded federal education spending. He pushed for and got Medicare prescription drug program. He could’t find his veto pen. He went underground during the financial crisis letting Paulson and the Democrats craft TARP and the bailout of GM and Chrysler. Don’t forget, the Republican House was brave enough to vote down the bailouts as fiscally irresponsible the first time TARP came up for vote. Then Johnny McCain, suspended his campaign like a fool and came running back to Washington to save the day. Paulson, Pelosi, Reid and Obama then played both Bush and McCain for fools and left the Republican House members hanging in the breeze.

George W. Bush set the stage for Obama by being fiscally irresponsible. Obama just took it to a whole new level.


18 posted on 04/22/2010 3:46:37 PM PDT by Soul of the South (When times are tough the tough get going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Stepan12

A Constitutional Republic cannot exist without an informed, moral electorate. This should be crystal clear to everyone, just seeing the nation for the past 30 years.

That is why I reserve my greatest scorn for my fellow voters. We really need to change the law to one taxpayer, one vote rather than one man, one vote (freeloaders included).


19 posted on 04/22/2010 4:00:45 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Bye bye Miss American Freedom. When did we vote for Communism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: vicar7

You are right in principal but I don’t think you are right that Bush trippled the national debt. I believe he raised it by 70%, which is horrific, but there is no need to exaggerate, unless you honestly believe he trippled the debt.

I believe it was under $7 trillion when he took office and around $11 trillion when he left office.


20 posted on 04/22/2010 4:03:54 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Bye bye Miss American Freedom. When did we vote for Communism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson