Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats push to stem corporate campaign money (Chuckie unveils WH-backed initiative)
Reuters on Yahoo ^ | 4/29/10 | David Morgan and Thomas Ferraro

Posted on 04/29/2010 1:59:17 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Democratic lawmakers on Thursday introduced legislation to blunt the impact of a recent Supreme Court ruling that allows corporations, unions and other groups to spend unlimited funds on political campaigns.

Unveiled by Senator Charles Schumer on the steps of the court, the White House-backed initiative calls for the unprecedented disclosure of money in politics three months after the court ruled 5-4 that long-standing campaign finance limits violated the free speech rights of corporations.

The court ruling is expected to unleash a flood of money from the traditionally pro-Republican business community to campaigns designed to favor or oppose candidates in this year's congressional elections and the 2012 presidential contest.

Schumer, who is spearheading the legislative counterattack with House Democrat Chris Van Hollen, said the Supreme Court stacked the deck against average Americans and predicted its ruling would be a factor in President Barack Obama's upcoming choice for the Supreme Court.

New measures require corporations, unions and other groups to disclose their financial roles in political TV campaigns including those that favor or oppose specific candidates.

"This legislation will stop the funneling of big money through shadow groups in order to fund ads that are virtually anonymous," said Schumer, who wants a Senate vote by July 4.

Obama welcomed the legislation as "the toughest-ever disclosure requirements for election-related spending" and urged swift consideration by the Democratic-led Congress.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: campaignmoney; corporate; democrats; schumer
If anyone knows how to 'fix' corruption, the Dems do.

(snicker)

1 posted on 04/29/2010 1:59:17 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

And no mention of Barry’s millions from GS & Wall Street. Stupid Party rides again.


2 posted on 04/29/2010 2:05:32 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

this has zero chance of passing, next


3 posted on 04/29/2010 2:17:16 PM PDT by italianquaker (My bartender knew about the attempted Christmas attack before odumbo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“I’m Van Delay Industries CEO Don Veeblefitzer, and I approve this message. Because you SUCK, Schumer!”


4 posted on 04/29/2010 2:56:21 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Full disclosure should have been the entire extent of the original Bill, not restriction.


5 posted on 04/29/2010 3:08:50 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Except to them.


6 posted on 04/29/2010 3:34:03 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson