Very nasty, if true. Take away soldiers right to defense in their own homes. Take away their 4th amendment rights in their own homes.
The trouble is, it is very hard to fight this in the courts.
1 posted on
05/10/2010 4:43:43 AM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
2 posted on
05/10/2010 4:47:03 AM PDT by
b4its2late
(Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?)
To: marktwain
They may be afraid of the military personell siding with the people.
To: marktwain
This b - - t - - d took an oath in front of millions to
“support, protect, and defend” . . .
He is violating this oath on a regular basis and should be impeached!!
To: marktwain
My advice, don’t register, keep guns at someone else’s house.
6 posted on
05/10/2010 4:50:55 AM PDT by
Boiling point
(Beck / Palin 2012)
To: marktwain
And the penalty is? How will it be enforced? Refusing to obey an unlawful order is not a crime - only the one who issues an unlawful order is guilty.
Come to think about it, all orders the Kenyan issues are unlawful.
7 posted on
05/10/2010 4:51:27 AM PDT by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
To: marktwain
Every gun my son owns I bought. I’d say I’ll be the first to be asked and like all my guns....they were lost at sea.
8 posted on
05/10/2010 4:52:04 AM PDT by
Recon Dad
( USMC SSgt Patrick O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 202)
To: marktwain
This has already been debunked.
9 posted on
05/10/2010 4:54:39 AM PDT by
999replies
(Thune/Rubio 2012)
To: marktwain
The implication is that soldiers who are qualified to defend this country from foreign enemies, aren’t qualified to keep a weapon at home or to carry it on base. Amazing what the Muslims can cause to happen.
To: marktwain
If I were still on Active Duty and told that I had to declare how much of anything I had inside of my private home I'd tell whomever was asking to mind their own damned business.
Something like this can only work if people cooperate with it, and if you are a gun owner you would be an idiot to go along quietly with something like this.
15 posted on
05/10/2010 5:28:29 AM PDT by
Bean Counter
(We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office -- Aesop)
To: marktwain
19 posted on
05/10/2010 5:57:31 AM PDT by
drpix
To: marktwain
20 posted on
05/10/2010 5:58:51 AM PDT by
rrrod
To: marktwain
I’ve seen other reports of this. They tried to do the same thing when I was in the military though.
The military is concerned about the suicide rate from what I understand.
24 posted on
05/10/2010 6:33:31 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: marktwain
Someone can correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t see how the military can control what a soldier owns, or how they store it, if it’s off post in their own private residence.
If anything, they could just “give” the firearms to family members. But I doubt the military would really try to do this. Talk about discouraging enlistment.
25 posted on
05/10/2010 4:46:48 PM PDT by
kamikaze2000
(You can lead a liberal to truth, but you can't make him think.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson