Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

That depends on the laser’s wavelength in relation to the size of the particles in the smoke. The longer the wavelength, the larger the particles must be to affect the light. IIRC, Saddam’s attempt to use smoke to hide his troop movements during the war failed because our satellites and surveillance aircraft all used long-wavelength IR sensors that were able to peer through the smoke. He couldn’t see us, but we could see him. Had a long-wavelength IR laser weapon been available at the time, it would have been more than capable of shooting through the smoke.


13 posted on 05/15/2010 11:09:36 AM PDT by Redcloak (What's your zombie plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Redcloak

This is addressed with additives to the smoke. The Russians were always very smoke conscious, so spent a lot of time developing obscurants to mess with US sensors and equipment. Likely they would have no problem selling this technology to just about anyone.

Dig a pit, fill with diesel and additives, ignite.


14 posted on 05/15/2010 11:38:13 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson