The Saudis are probably contributing at least 90% of the funds.
If the want a mosk then build it in the Sahara.
Ping!
Leave bacon strips all over the place.
“Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf has insisted the project he’s spearheading is meant to build bridges between Muslims and other religions, but so far he has not been able to cite any specific sources of funding. “
Tell them its okay with us, providing we can
“pasture-ize” Mecca, and build a Disneyland on it.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
On “Fox and Friends” this morning, there was a guest, a former NYC fireman and member of a Sept. 11 group. He held up a magazine from a foreign country that is calling for mohammedans to donate money for this monstrosity. The guy gave the translation, and it was quite clear that these pigs are crowing about the idea that they will build this mosque on the “rubble of the WTC”. He explained that they say it is for “dawalla” (sp?), which, he said, is a call for all others to join their “religion”, a call, he explained, which precedes jihad.
How much more in our faces can these animals get?
There, fixed it.
Moslem = terrorist. Islam is a satantic cult which must be eliminated from the face of the earth and sent back to hell wher eit came from.
The war on terror ends with the death of the last moslem. (Since their religion command sthem to lie if they can gain advantage by it we cannot trust conversions, sadly)
islam (small i) is neither a religion, nor is it peaceful.
The analogy of building a Japanese learning Center on the island of Hawaii immediately after Pearl Harbor is spot on.
There is absolutely no limit to muslim chutzpah.
This is outrageous. Let’s bomb Riyadh and then propose building a church on the site of the destruction. I’m sure that would go over very well.
The fact is, as long as we send billions over to Saudi and states that support terrorism, we cannot ever be free of the threat. You want to win the war on terrorism, forget about Iraq and Afghanistan, that's just duct taping a leak. Cut the flow of dollars! Drill, drill, and then drill some more while our scientists figure out how to make fusion energy or some other energy source that will end the world's dependence on oil forever.
If middle eastern nations figure out some other way to stay wealthy without oil revenues, fine. Otherwise, I'm okay with returning the middle east to it's historical place as a god-forsaken sand dune full of hateful but impotent people with no means to project their misery and hatred outside their own poverty stricken village.
I guess conservatives are busy with the issue of illegal immigration, but I hope they start focussing their attention on this issue urgently or else this could go down in history as a national shame.
The Islamist plan to build a mosque near the ground zero ruins is akin to planting a victory flag on the ruins of a battlefield - a gesture that is highly insensitive to the victims and damaging to national pride.
It seems like they are doing their best to shape public opinion in their favor, building support among the local community !
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/05/tonight-community-board-1-in.html
The atmosphere was rowdy, with tempers running high. The mosque proponents and the politicians were primarily responsible for this, as they immediately began to brand the opponents of the mosque initiative as racists and bigots. The local city councilwoman, whose name I believe was Chan, characterized all opposition to the mosque as hatred and bigotry, and said that to support the mosque was simply a matter of tolerance and pluralism. Mosque proponents distributed a written statement from Stringer, favoring the mosque and saying: "I for one never want to see our country or our city abandon religious tolerance as the result of an act of violence, even one as unspeakable as the 9/11 attacks."
This kind of talk angered the mosque opponents in the crowd, and there were many. There was a great deal of catcalling and booing of the multiculturalist platitudes and self-righteous moralizing, and the schoolmarmish chairperson of the Community Board repeatedly warned catcallers in the crowd that they would be held "out of order" -- but their threats were as toothless and empty as their moralizing, and the indignation of the crowd would break out repeatedly throughout the evening whenever another bemused liberal or smooth-talking Muslim would excoriate "hatred" and "bigotry" and extol "tolerance." Daisy Khan showed a brief Power Point presentation that said, among other things, that the Islamic Center would help non-Muslims to integrate.
Interesting word choice. Not help Muslims to integrate into the American secular fabric, but to help non-Muslims to integrate. Into...a Sharia state? Is that the goal?
Those who wanted to speak filled out forms giving their names and their planned topics, and were each allotted two minutes, although pro-mosque speakers were frequently given much longer. Feisal Abdul Rauf must have taken ten minutes, and Daisy Khan about that long. I put down on my form something like "Sharia law" as my topic, and turned it in. It became clear as soon as speakers started being called that the people running the show planned to call only supporters of the mosque initiative first -- apparently so that as the speakers started to make the same points that had already been made by earlier speakers, and people started to leave the hall, the side that would be given short shrift would be the mosque opponents. So imagine my surprise when, very early in the meeting, when several people had already spoken for the mosque and scolded the "bigotry" of its opponents, the Board called as just the fourth or fifth speaker...Pamela Geller.