Drunk men = Good Ol' Boys jess havin fun.
Definition of slut:
* o - an offensive term for a woman thought to be sexually promiscuous
* o - an offensive term for a woman who charges for engaging in sexual activities
* o - an offensive term for a woman who is regarded as not concerned about conventional standards of domestic cleanliness.
Nothing in the article remotely resembles that definition with the exception (maybe a stretch) of one woman, a young lady, and her beau trying to have sex.
But guys who are sexually promiscuous are called studs which would figure considering the current standards.
When it comes to the nature of sex, there is no equality not in Human society or in nature. Women are the sellers of sex and men are the buyers. Women are the sellers because only young pretty women are in demand (which is the minority of most women. Women cease to be ‘sellers’ once they age and lose the youthful looks of fertility).
“Sluts” or “prostitutes” means “stupid woman”. The woman is so stupid that she is giving sex away or selling it at a very low price. Smart women sell sex at an extremely high price such as ‘marriage’ (e.g. the man becoming her wage slave).
The opposite is true for men because they are the buyers. A man who is able to get tons of sex for a low price or for free is considered ‘smart’.
There is no double standard here when you realize that women are the sellers and men are the buyers. When the sellers sell for little or nothing, they are declared ‘stupid’. When the buyer buys for little or nothing, they are declared ‘smart’. That is what the ‘slut’ and ‘stud’ difference is all about.
I suppose there’s supposed to be a point in there somewhere. Damned if I can find it.
Ding ding ding! We have a winner!
Good post.
Being the father of two girls, I also find the use of the ‘S’ word for girls.
Its interesting the logic even very smart people use. My father had set up a scholarship for kids from his old high school, and was not happy to see one of them went to a girl that was pregnant, and had even considered stopping it over the issue. He was very happy with the next years winner.
He was a bit shocked when I suggested this years winner may have been the father of the child (hey, it takes two to tango). I think it had totaly escaped him that the young men who were applying may have had parental responsibilities he was unaware of.
There is definitly a double standard out there.
I don’t think males would have been called sluts for messing up a room.
The word "stud" does not have very positive meanings.
It either means a metallic bump of some kind, a cheap replacement for a real earring, or an animal no longer useful for farm work but still able to produce new animals that might be useful.
If the generic conversational term for a promiscuous man were "hero" or "genius" or "saint" you might have had a point.
As it is, you don't.
A slut is someone who will not have sex with you.
OR
Someone who has had sex one more time than you.
But guys who are sexually promiscuous are called studs which would figure considering the current standards.
If a key opens a hundred different locks it's a great key.
If a hundred different keys can unlock a lock, it's a crappy lock.