To: GOPGuide
There were proselytes in Roman times. The Jewish monotheism held certain attractions theologically and morally. But I am suspicious of research that suggests that modern Jews are different genetically from the biblical ones. That can be a wedge for antisemitism.
5 posted on
06/10/2010 9:12:50 AM PDT by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: Genoa
There were proselytes in Roman times. The Jewish monotheism held certain attractions theologically and morally. But I am suspicious of research that suggests that modern Jews are different genetically from the biblical ones. That can be a wedge for antisemitism. I would tend to agree, which is why I'm also leery of the Khazar story. IIRC, only the aristocracy in Khazaria actually converted to Judaism in any great numbers, not the rank and file who typically make up mass population movements.
9 posted on
06/10/2010 9:17:08 AM PDT by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
To: Genoa
“that suggests that modern Jews are different genetically from the biblical ones.”
The study said the Middle Eastern Jews like Persian and Iraqi Jews are closest to the original population of Israel.
But there appear to be different Jewish ethnicities based on where certain Jewish populations have lived for centuries because Judaism is a religion.
11 posted on
06/10/2010 9:17:37 AM PDT by
GOPGuide
To: Genoa
That can be a wedge for antisemitism.I ran across it on a thread here a while back. Some guy was going on about banking and the Rothschilds not being real Jews but Khazars.
15 posted on
06/10/2010 9:22:28 AM PDT by
Bubba Ho-Tep
("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
To: Genoa
That can be a wedge for antisemitism there is some validity to that but in a cultural tradition whereby being in the tribe is mostly a birthright it comes with the territory and for no small reason academia in Israel spends a lot of time and money on this subject
24 posted on
06/10/2010 9:44:18 AM PDT by
wardaddy
(I am not in favor of practical endorsements in primaries, endorse the conservative please)
To: Genoa
But I am suspicious of research that suggests that modern Jews are different genetically from the biblical ones.
Yes. Especially considering that the Kohenim (Priestly) DNA marker is extremely well documented... and Kohenim can have blue eyes and blond hair as well.
67 posted on
06/10/2010 1:39:35 PM PDT by
Tzfat
To: Genoa
There were proselytes in Roman times. The Jewish monotheism held certain attractions theologically and morally. But I am suspicious of research that suggests that modern Jews are different genetically from the biblical ones. That can be a wedge for antisemitism.No worries, there's DNA testing. This may have some relevance but it only takes a test to find the Jews and the differing strains...however one can still convert and never have the DNA...eh Cap'n obvious to the rescue here.
80 posted on
06/10/2010 8:30:59 PM PDT by
Karliner
("Things are more like they are now than they ever were before."DDE)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson