Isn’t surveillance and reconnaissance the reason for military satellites?
I also think the working altitude of these craft is much too low. I’ll bet dollars to donuts that the Afghans can shoot ‘em down.
Occasionally, someone on the NAS Tower frequency will say "**** 1, cleared direct to one two thousand feet." Or one five thousand feet.
a)They aren't 737s. b)They are dots or less at 15,000 ft.
I go outside to watch and listen.
Sounds like freedom.
Time to climb is amazing.
/johnny
You would bet wrong. 20K ft is 4 miles.
Largest round in this house is .50BMG. I paid the price of a small Kia for the scope and subsequent mods by the factory.
One mile, if I hand it to someone that can actually see, and we use the $5.00/round Arizona Ammunition precision rounds that I stocked up on back when they were only $5.00.
Russian SAMs might hit it, but Kadaffi won't vouch for them. He wanted surface to airplane missiles, and the Soviets kept sending him surface to air missiles.
There's a reason they aren't called hittles.
/johnny