Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brown would vote 'no' on Wall St. bill; blames $19B in new bank fees
The Hill ^ | 6/29/10 | Silla Brush

Posted on 06/29/2010 9:23:41 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) said Tuesday that he would oppose the Wall Street overhaul bill as it stands because of the $19 billion in fees it would place on big financial firms.

In a letter to Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), Brown expressed "strong opposition" to the fees that were added in the conference process between House and Senate lawmakers last week.

"If the final version of the bill contains these higher taxes, I will not support it," he said.

The letter is the strongest indication yet that Brown will vote against the Wall Street overhaul bill. Brown had voted for the Senate's original version of the legislation before the fee was added.

The conference bill cannot be amended on the House and Senate floor. House and Senate lawmakers were planning to pass the overhaul bill this week.

Sen. Robert Byrd's (D-W.Va.) death on Monday has sent Senate Democrats scrambling to shore up votes for the financial overhaul.

Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) said Monday he would oppose the bill. That is putting pressure on Senate Democrats to win over the votes of Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) and at least one other Republican.

It's possible that Byrd's appointed successor, to be named by West Virginia's Democratic governor, would vote with Democats, which would put off a vote on the conference report until he is seated.

But Brown's defection may create a much bigger problem.

"It is wrong to impose higher taxes and ignore the impact it will have on our economy without considering other ways we might offset the costs of the measure," Brown said. "I am asking that the conference committee find a way to offset the cost of the bill by cutting unnecessary federal spending. There are hundreds of billions in unspent federal funds sitting around, some authorized years ago for long-dead initiatives. Congress needs to start to looking there first, and I stand ready to help."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: bankfees; financial; overhaul; scottbrown; wallstreet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 06/29/2010 9:23:44 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“I’m Scott Brown, I’m from Wrentham, and I drive a truck!”

Good man, Mr. Brown.


2 posted on 06/29/2010 9:25:56 AM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This as..

MASS. POLL: Scott Brown More Popular Than Obama Or Kerry
http://www.witn.com/news/headlines/97335724.html


3 posted on 06/29/2010 9:26:42 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Make no mistake, banks will very easily and quickly find a way to pass those fees down to the customer.

I haven't paid a fee to a bank in years... I do not intend to start now!

4 posted on 06/29/2010 9:27:42 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Another Stupak move?

I’m against it until you formally ask for me to vote at the Roll Call.


5 posted on 06/29/2010 9:28:26 AM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I have to wonder if Sen. Brown is engaging in a little schadenfreude here. Vote yes early, and just when it looks like the bill will get through, yank the football Lucy style.


6 posted on 06/29/2010 9:31:15 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Victors study demographics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Well, that’s good news. However, Messrs. Obama and Kerry are both radioactive.

There is a lot of buyer’s remorse in MA.

For example, Mr. Brown won Barney Frank’s House District by two-to-one.


7 posted on 06/29/2010 9:31:15 AM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Regardless of how BS this overall bill is, the only thing holding Mr. Brown from voting in favor of it is just the $19 in new bank fees/taxes? Incredible.....=.=
8 posted on 06/29/2010 9:31:56 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
.

Brown, like most legislators, has a "FOR SALE" sign outside his office. My money says the administration will meet his price.

9 posted on 06/29/2010 9:42:50 AM PDT by Roccus (......and then there were none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
This as.. MASS. POLL: Scott Brown More Popular Than Obama Or Kerry http://www.witn.com/news/headlines/97335724.html

This shows how infatuated America (and Massachusetts too) is with a new face. This is how we got stuck with Obimbo. This is why the tired old faces of the GOP don't stand a chance. Who will be new and untainted in 2012?

10 posted on 06/29/2010 9:42:50 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

It’s a tax for the banks, and a fee for all of us slubs that will pay them when it gets passed thru the local pocketbook.


11 posted on 06/29/2010 9:44:05 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cranked
Regardless of how BS this overall bill is, the only thing holding Mr. Brown from voting in favor of it is just the $19 in new bank fees/taxes? Incredible.....=.=

Exactly. What Brown is doing is leaving open the door for his support at the $13 billion level. Or the $9 billion level. Or, wait a minute, at the $19 billon level after all:

""It is wrong to impose higher taxes and ignore the impact it will have on our economy without considering other ways we might offset the costs of the measure," Brown said. "I am asking that the conference committee find a way to offset the cost of the bill by cutting unnecessary federal spending."
So if the conference committee were to cut $19 billion somewhere, Brown would be just fine with this disaster of a bill.
12 posted on 06/29/2010 9:57:01 AM PDT by Dahoser (Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Obama keeps shoving it to the ORDINARY WORKERS (under $250,000 included)...who are paying this “tax”...one way or another.


13 posted on 06/29/2010 9:57:46 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Obama forgets (plays stupid)....There are WORKING stockholders and retirees. They will not be happy with lower returns and dividends.


14 posted on 06/29/2010 10:00:30 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Obama forgets (plays stupid)....There are WORKING stockholders and retirees. They will not be happy with lower returns and dividends.


15 posted on 06/29/2010 10:00:50 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Obama forgets (plays stupid)....There are WORKING stockholders and retirees. They will not be happy with lower returns and dividends.


16 posted on 06/29/2010 10:00:53 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
the Wall Street overhaul bill as it stands because of the $19 billion in fees it would place on big financial firms.

Only one entity pays taxes, the people. If politicians tax companies those taxes are passed on to the customers.

17 posted on 06/29/2010 10:13:22 AM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
Another Stupak move?

Yep...but not by Brown. There's no way Feingold is voting against this.

18 posted on 06/29/2010 10:21:57 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I sent him an e-mail yesterday; I’m one of his constituents. I pointed out that Barney Frank and Chris Dodd were two of the architects of the problems we have in the economy right now, through their protection of Fannie and Freddie, and the set up that made it possible for large institutions to private profits while socializing the risks from the mortgages that were being made to folks who should never have been approved for them. I told him that I wouldn’t trust Frank and Dodd to get ANYTHING right with regards to the economy or regulation of financial institutions.


19 posted on 06/29/2010 10:37:27 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Unless a legislator has ample executive experience, I am not interested in a former Senator/Congressperson as President.


20 posted on 06/29/2010 10:49:19 AM PDT by FreeStateYank (I want my country and constitution back, now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson