I happen to agree. There is absolutely no reason Mr. Obama should not be tried for treason.
Please let it happen quickly can not stand much more of this. Nov. hopefully will be a good start.
I'm not sure I agree with this assertion. The Constitution defines Treason as follows:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. |
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted. |
Certainly challenging Arizona's sovereignty by challenging SB 1070 in court is providing aid and comfort to illegal aliens. The question thus becomes "are illegal aliens enemies?" According to Dictionary.com 'Invasion' is defined as follows:
in·va·sion /ɪnˈveɪʒən/ [in-vey-zhuhn] |
---|
noun
|
There is also the matter of destroying the legal system of the US, violating all contract-law; the government takeover of GM/Chrysler. This is a bit more theoretical a proof, and a bit more difficult to prove (deserving its own long paper) but suffice it to say that by voiding contract-law the Executive (along with a complicit Legislative & Judicial) have dealt a big blow to the integrity/legitimacy of the federal government {the Constitution prohibits the sort of violation of contracts that occurred}.