She is unelectable for the office of the President. A majority of people will not vote for her.
That is pure horse crap and you know it.
Why would they not vote for her if she is the alternative to Obama’s economy ?
I don’t believe you have enough information to back that comment up. Sarah Palin has not had her own national Presidential campaign, she has not debated Barack Obama 3 times.
You don’t know how people will judge her if she does. I don’t either. But I happen to like her chances.
Yeah, yeah, yeah...opinions are like - you know.
But it’s silly to think Palin would be remotely interested in the job of RNC chair. For one thing, like Rush often says, why would she want to take the cut in pay? She can earn millions for herself on the lecture circuit and is answerable only to herself. Anyone who would expect her to a) become the leader of a Party she doesn’t always agree with, b) sit down, shut up, and mouth the Party line rather than what she truly believes, and c) use her phenomenal fund-raising potential for the RNC rather than her own family and future is delirious.
As for your “opinions”....only time will tell.
I'd be willing to bet a bottle of 18 year old Scotch that if you do a basic internet search you will see the same sentiments made by pompous gasbags who think they know everything about Obama and Regan.
“She is unelectable for the office of the President. A majority of people will not vote for her.”
If you are going to make that claim at least go out on a limb a little and say who you think is more electable.
But a majority of the Electoral College might.
I totally agree. She's become more of a 'soap opera' than a serious presidential candidate. I know the bar was very much lowered by our current office holder, but we shouldn't use that as a starting point for what we consider to be 'presidential'. We desperately need someone like Reagan. Someone that can communicate, knows how America works, and can restore optimism.
Spoken like a true elitist libertarian. It is instructive that you provide nothing that supports your statement.
Please explain why there are never enough seats in any venue she chooses to appear to hear her speak?
It sort of depends more than a little as to who her opponent will be. People who wouldn’t normally vote for her might if Barack Obama continues to botch things at the current rate. OTOH, if BO becomes an election liability, the Dems will ditch him pronto. And who will be up then? Dear old Hillary?
They know she represents the best of Reagan & Thatcher and are truly fearful of her winning in 2012. The marxists have thrown everything at her and her family and she remains strong, determined and the leader of the Conservativeness movement to take back America from the communists.
Your statement is, at the very least, defeatist or worse by acting on behalf of a RINO candidate like Myth Romney.
I find it extremely discouraging that some on our side repeat leftist taking points without any basis in facts. *shakes head*
On topic, if anyone thinks the MSM isn't the enemy is ill informed at best.
“She is unelectable for the office of the President. A majority of people will not vote for her”
One person’s opinion.
No argument from me, MrRob
Funny, they used to say that about Reagan.
I wonder how that turned out?
You mean like a majority of people wouldn’t vote for a muslim with no real world experience?
“She is unelectable for the office of the President. A majority of people will not vote for her.”
The smear campaign against her, is no different than what they tried to do to Reagan